Differential Diagnosis, Decision-Making, and Pathways of Care for ATOS

2013 ◽  
pp. 583-587
Author(s):  
William H. Pearce
2022 ◽  
pp. 194187442110567
Author(s):  
Naomi Niznick ◽  
Ronda Lun ◽  
Daniel A. Lelli ◽  
Tadeu A. Fantaneanu

We present a clinical reasoning case of 42-year-old male with a history of type 1 diabetes who presented to hospital with decreased level of consciousness. We review the approach to coma including initial approach to differential diagnosis and investigations. After refining the diagnostic options based on initial investigations, we review the clinical decision-making process with a focus on narrowing the differential diagnosis, further investigations, and treatment.


2019 ◽  
pp. 221-240
Author(s):  
Isaac Tong ◽  
R. Jason Yong ◽  
Beth B. Hogans

Chapter 13 reviews some common pain-associated emergencies and also discusses some complications of pain treatments that require immediate attention. Pain is a common occurrence in emergent illness, and some complications of pain treatments require emergent management. Chest pain is an excellent example of clinical decision-making following a process of organized, rapid pain assessment and then diagnostic and treatment reasoning based on the findings and observations of the clinical assessment. Providers assessing patients for acute chest pain elicit basic pain characteristics of region, quality, severity, and timing as well as usually associated factors and then pursue testing and treatment for elements in the differential diagnosis accordingly. The chapter illustrates this same process applied to conditions of acute abdominal, limb, headache, and spine emergencies. In the second part of the chapter, emergencies arising in the context of pain treatments are discussed, including overdose and withdrawal from opioids, benzodiazepines, and other pain-active medications as well as pump and device complications.


Author(s):  
Scott Aberegg ◽  
Sean Callahan

The well-known clinical axiom stating that “common things are common” attests to the pivotal role of probability in diagnosis. Despite the popularity of this and related axioms, there is no operationalized definition of a common disease, and no practicable way of incorporating actual disease frequencies into differential diagnosis. In this expository essay, we aim to reduce the ambiguity surrounding the definition of a common (or rare) disease and show that incidence – not prevalence – is the proper metric of disease frequency for diagnosis. We explore how a numerical estimates of disease frequencies based on incidence can be incorporated into differential diagnosis as well as the inherent limitations of this method. These concepts have important implications for diagnostic decision making and medical education, and hold promise as a method to improve diagnostic accuracy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 324-332
Author(s):  
Courtney Byrd

AbstractClinicians commonly report difficulty determining whether the disfluencies produced by their clients are indicative of stuttering or suggestive of something else, such as cluttering, autism, language impairment, or second language learning. In our clinical decision-making process, we identify features unique to specific speech and/or language disorders. This identification enables differential diagnosis in most cases. But what happens when features appear to overlap and, as a result, compromise our clinical decision making? This article provides information to assist in the differential diagnosis of stuttering, particularly as it pertains to the assessment of children who speak more than one language. It explores similarities in the speech behaviors produced by these speakers, contrasting them with stuttering behaviors in monolingual English speakers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document