scholarly journals CLINICAL DECISION MAKING AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS IN A CYCLIST WITH UPPER QUARTER PAIN, NUMBNESS, AND WEAKNESS: A CASE REPORT

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-268
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Briggs ◽  
Katherine K. Rethman ◽  
Matthew T. Lopez
2022 ◽  
pp. 194187442110567
Author(s):  
Naomi Niznick ◽  
Ronda Lun ◽  
Daniel A. Lelli ◽  
Tadeu A. Fantaneanu

We present a clinical reasoning case of 42-year-old male with a history of type 1 diabetes who presented to hospital with decreased level of consciousness. We review the approach to coma including initial approach to differential diagnosis and investigations. After refining the diagnostic options based on initial investigations, we review the clinical decision-making process with a focus on narrowing the differential diagnosis, further investigations, and treatment.


2019 ◽  
pp. 221-240
Author(s):  
Isaac Tong ◽  
R. Jason Yong ◽  
Beth B. Hogans

Chapter 13 reviews some common pain-associated emergencies and also discusses some complications of pain treatments that require immediate attention. Pain is a common occurrence in emergent illness, and some complications of pain treatments require emergent management. Chest pain is an excellent example of clinical decision-making following a process of organized, rapid pain assessment and then diagnostic and treatment reasoning based on the findings and observations of the clinical assessment. Providers assessing patients for acute chest pain elicit basic pain characteristics of region, quality, severity, and timing as well as usually associated factors and then pursue testing and treatment for elements in the differential diagnosis accordingly. The chapter illustrates this same process applied to conditions of acute abdominal, limb, headache, and spine emergencies. In the second part of the chapter, emergencies arising in the context of pain treatments are discussed, including overdose and withdrawal from opioids, benzodiazepines, and other pain-active medications as well as pump and device complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 550-554
Author(s):  
Rajiv Dharampal Bhola ◽  
Sweta Gajanan Kale Pisulkar ◽  
Surekha Anil Dubey Godbole ◽  
Hetal Satish Purohit ◽  
Anjali Bhoyar Borle

Combined intra and extra oral defects can be stated as those facial defects which have an intraoral communicating route. Midfacial defects are aptly classified into 2 major categories by Marunick et al. 1 as midline midfacial defects in which the nose and / or upper lip defects are included; and the second major group was lateral defects in which the cheek and orbital defects are categorized. However, defects which include combinations of the above-mentioned defects are in existence. Midfacial defects which are acquired, present themselves often with severe disfigurement of structures and hence show impaired function. It is a meticulous task to rehabilitate the defects which are caused as a result of cancerous lesion resection as they are huge. Such post resection lesions frequently are rehabilitated by a facial prosthesis to maintain function as well as the appearance in the normal form. In adjunction to the facial prosthesis, an intraoral prosthesis which constitutes of an obturator is also required to regain the natural speech and pattern of swallowing. Fabrication of such facial prosthesis not only requires the artistic capability but also excellent clinical decision making of the prosthodontist. Mode of retention of the combined prosthesis should also be kept in mind while fabricating as it is also a difficult task to retain them because of the size and weight of the same. Moreover the prosthesis should also be secured in its place with these aids which can also prove as a challenge. This case report states rehabilitating a large surgically resected midfacial defect with the assistance of a “3-piece prosthesis” which constitutes a sectional intraoral obturator along with maxillary and mandibular extraoral facial prosthesis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 324-332
Author(s):  
Courtney Byrd

AbstractClinicians commonly report difficulty determining whether the disfluencies produced by their clients are indicative of stuttering or suggestive of something else, such as cluttering, autism, language impairment, or second language learning. In our clinical decision-making process, we identify features unique to specific speech and/or language disorders. This identification enables differential diagnosis in most cases. But what happens when features appear to overlap and, as a result, compromise our clinical decision making? This article provides information to assist in the differential diagnosis of stuttering, particularly as it pertains to the assessment of children who speak more than one language. It explores similarities in the speech behaviors produced by these speakers, contrasting them with stuttering behaviors in monolingual English speakers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
Hyun Kim ◽  
Mohammed Alshalalfa ◽  
Jean Hoffman-Censits ◽  
Costas D. Lallas ◽  
Elai Davicioni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document