The Contextual-Epistemic Approach to Psychotherapy

1989 ◽  
pp. 115-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher K. Germer
Keyword(s):  
Epistemic Approach

Democracy's Wisdom: An Aristotelian Middle Way for Collective Judgment

2013 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSIAH OBER
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Common Interest ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Domain Experts ◽  
Middle Way ◽  
Satisfactory Model ◽  
Collective Judgment ◽  
The World ◽  
Epistemic Approach ◽  
Multiple Domains

A satisfactory model of decision-making in an epistemic democracy must respect democratic values, while advancing citizens’ interests, by taking account of relevant knowledge about the world. Analysis of passages in Aristotle and legislative process in classical Athens points to a “middle way” between independent-guess aggregation and deliberation: an epistemic approach to decision-making that offers a satisfactory model of collective judgment that is both time-sensitive and capable of setting agendas endogenously. By aggregating expertise across multiple domains, Relevant Expertise Aggregation (REA) enables a body of minimally competent voters to make superior choices among multiple options, on matters of common interest. REA differs from a standard Condorcet jury in combining deliberation with voting based on judgments about the reputations and arguments of domain-experts.

On epistemic and ontological interpretations of intuitionistic and paraconsistent paradigms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Carnielli ◽  
Abilio Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Intuitionistic Logic ◽  
Classical Logic ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Constructive Proof ◽  
Technical Point ◽  
Preservation Of Evidence ◽  
Epistemic Approach ◽  
Epistemic Interpretation ◽  
Excluded Middle

Abstract From the technical point of view, philosophically neutral, the duality between a paraconsistent and a paracomplete logic (for example intuitionistic logic) lies in the fact that explosion does not hold in the former and excluded middle does not hold in the latter. From the point of view of the motivations for rejecting explosion and excluded middle, this duality can be interpreted either ontologically or epistemically. An ontological interpretation of intuitionistic logic is Brouwer’s idealism; of paraconsistency is dialetheism. The epistemic interpretation of intuitionistic logic is in terms of preservation of constructive proof; of paraconsistency is in terms of preservation of evidence. In this paper, we explain and defend the epistemic approach to paraconsistency. We argue that it is more plausible than dialetheism and allows a peaceful and fruitful coexistence with classical logic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document