Disregarding Wind Power: Introduction to Finnish Feed-in Tariff Policy

2011 ◽  
pp. 115-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miikka Salo
Keyword(s):  
Wind Power ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Feed In Tariff

Resource misallocation in the Chinese wind power industry: The role of feed-in tariff policy

2021 ◽  
pp. 105236
Author(s):  
Chin-Hsien Yu ◽  
Xiuqin Wu ◽  
Wen-Chieh Lee ◽  
Jinsong Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Wind Power ◽  
Power Industry ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Resource Misallocation ◽  
Wind Power Industry ◽  
Feed In Tariff

scholarly journals Regional difference and industrial effects of wind power feed-in-tariff policy

资源科学 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-22
Author(s):  
Yanyun ZHAO ◽  
Qian LI ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Wind Power ◽  
Regional Difference ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Feed In Tariff

scholarly journals Feed-in tariff policy in Hong Kong: Is it efficient?

2021 ◽  
pp. 100056
Author(s):  
Prudence Dato ◽  
Tunç Durmaz ◽  
Aude Pommeret
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Feed In Tariff

scholarly journals Solar electricity market in Malaysia: A review of feed-in tariff policy

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 600-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bakhtyar ◽  
O. Saadatian ◽  
M.A. Alghoul ◽  
Y. Ibrahim ◽  
K. Sopian
Keyword(s):  
Electricity Market ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Solar Electricity ◽  
Feed In Tariff

scholarly journals Evaluating the Feed-in Tariff Policy in the Philippines

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Marie Lagac ◽  
Josef T. Yap
Keyword(s):  
The Philippines ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Feed In Tariff

scholarly journals Impact of Financing Instruments and Strategies on the Wind Power Production Costs: A Case of Lithuania

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-27
Author(s):  
V. Bobinaite ◽  
I. Konstantinaviciute
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Wind Power ◽  
Electricity Market ◽  
Power Production ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Support Measures ◽  
Extended Approach ◽  
Investment Subsidy ◽  
Feed In Tariff

Abstract The paper aims at demonstrating the relevance of financing instruments, their terms and financing strategies in relation to the cost of wind power production and the ability of wind power plant (PP) to participate in the electricity market in Lithuania. The extended approach to the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) is applied. The feature of the extended approach lies in considering the lifetime cost and revenue received from the support measures. The research results have substantiated the relevance of financing instruments, their terms and strategies in relation to their impact on the LCOE and competitiveness of wind PP. It has been found that financing of wind PP through the traditional financing instruments (simple shares and bank loans) makes use of venture capital and bonds coming even in the absence of any support. It has been estimated that strategies consisting of different proportions of hard and soft loans, bonds, own and venture capital result in the average LCOE of 5.1–5.7 EURct/kWh (2000 kW), when the expected electricity selling price is 5.4 EURct/kWh. The financing strategies with higher shares of equity could impact by around 6 % higher LCOE compared to the strategies encompassing higher shares of debt. However, seeking to motivate venture capitalists, bond holders or other new financiers entering the wind power sector, support measures (feed-in tariff or investment subsidy) are relevant in case of 250 kW wind PP. It has been estimated that under the unsupported financing strategies, the average LCOE of 250 kW wind PP will be 7.8–8.8 EURct/kWh, but it will reduce by around 50 % if feed-in tariff or 50 % investment subsidy is applied.

Multiple Streams and Power Sector Policy Change: Evidence from the Feed‐in Tariff Policy Process in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 464-489
Author(s):  
Yugo Tanaka ◽  
Andrew Chapman ◽  
Tetsuo Tezuka ◽  
Shigeki Sakurai
Keyword(s):  
Policy Change ◽  
Policy Process ◽  
Multiple Streams ◽  
Tariff Policy ◽  
Power Sector ◽  
Feed In Tariff
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document