Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems for Acute Renal Transplant Rejection: Challenges and Methodologies

2013 ◽  
pp. 1-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mostapha ◽  
Fahmi Khalifa ◽  
Amir Alansary ◽  
Ahmed Soliman ◽  
Jasjit Suri ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Shehata ◽  
Fahmi Khalifa ◽  
Ahmed Soliman ◽  
Mohammed Ghazal ◽  
Fatma Taher ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S70-S70
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Chuan Tian ◽  
Chun Mei Wang ◽  
Chun Guang Fan ◽  
Gang Liu

1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. DE DOMBAL ◽  
J. C. HORROCKS ◽  
J. R. STANILAND ◽  
P. J. GUILLOU

This paper describes a series of 10,500 attempts at »pattern-recognition« by two groups of humans and a computer based system. There was little difference between the performances of 11 clinicians and 11 other persons of comparable intellectual capability. Both groups’ performances were related to the pattern-size, the accuracy diminishing rapidly as the patterns grew larger. By contrast the computer system increased its accuracy as the patterns increased in size.It is suggested (a) that clinicians are very little better than others at pattem-recognition, (b) that the clinician is incapable of analysing on a probabilistic basis the data he collects during a traditional clinical interview and examination and (c) that the study emphasises once again a major difference between human and computer performance. The implications as - regards human- and computer-aided diagnosis are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kashin ◽  
R Kuvaev ◽  
E Kraynova ◽  
H Edelsbrunner ◽  
O Dunaeva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document