A Reduction in Mixed Function Oxidases and in Tumor Promoting Effects of Ethanol in a NDEA-Initiated Hepatocarcinogenesis Model

Author(s):  
Siraj I. Mufti ◽  
I. Glenn Sipes
Xenobiotica ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bobik ◽  
G. M. Holder ◽  
A. J. Ryan ◽  
L. I. Wiebe

Author(s):  
Hafiz Azhar Ali Khan ◽  
Waseem Akram ◽  
Sajid Ali

Abstract A Musca domestica L. strain collected from Pakistan has recently been shown to be resistant to spinosad; however, there is scarce information about the mechanism of resistance. For this reason, we explored whether a metabolic-based mechanism was responsible by analyzing the activities of the metabolic detoxifying enzymes, carboxylesterases, glutathione S-transferases, and mixed-function oxidases, in both a spinosad-selected (Spin-SEL) strain of M. domestica and a susceptible counterpart (Lab-susceptible). The results revealed that both strains were statistically at par in terms of enzyme activities. The activity of carboxylesterases in the Lab-susceptible strain was 78.17 ± 3.06 in comparison to 79.16 ± 3.31 nmol min−1 mg−1 in the Spin-SEL strain. The activity of mixed-function oxidases was 51.58 ± 4.20 in the Lab-susceptible strain, whereas 54.33 ± 4.08 pmol min−1 mg−1 was recorded in the Spin-SEL strain. The activity of glutathione S-transferases was 86.50 ± 4.59 (Lab-susceptible) and 90.33 ± 2.81 nmol min−1 mg−1 (Spin-SEL). These results revealed that the studied enzymes might not be responsible for spinosad resistance in the studied strain of M. domestica. Therefore, studies should be extended to find out other possible mechanisms of spinosad resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document