Characterization of HER2 Status by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

2014 ◽  
pp. 181-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver A. Press ◽  
Roberta Guzman ◽  
Monica Cervantes ◽  
Angela Santiago ◽  
Michael F. Press
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Her2 Status

scholarly journals Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Elna Moerland ◽  
Rens L. H. P. M. van Hezik ◽  
Toine C. J. M. van der Aa ◽  
Mike W. P. M. van Beek ◽  
Adriaan J. C. van den Brule
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Her2 Gene Amplification ◽  
Dependent Probe

In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas.

Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of the DiGeorge Syndrome Region Using Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

Genomics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Lindsay ◽  
Stephanie Halford ◽  
Roy Wadey ◽  
Peter J. Scambler ◽  
Antonio Baldini
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Digeorge Syndrome ◽  
Molecular Cytogenetic ◽  
Cytogenetic Characterization

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 4287-4297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
David Cowan ◽  
Kelly Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Characterization of 9p21 copy number alterations in human melanoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization

2008 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsa Rákosy ◽  
Laura Vízkeleti ◽  
Szilvia Ecsedi ◽  
Ágnes Bégány ◽  
Gabriella Emri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Human Melanoma ◽  
Copy Number Alterations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document