Emergency Department and Observation Unit Discharge Criteria

Author(s):  
Rachel Rockford ◽  
Deborah B. Diercks
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e000688
Author(s):  
Czer Anthoney Enriquez Lim ◽  
Julie Oh ◽  
Erick Eiting ◽  
Catherine Coughlin ◽  
Yvette Calderon ◽  
...  

BackgroundRecent trends towards more cost-efficient and patient-centred treatment are converging to provide opportunities to improve the care of children. Observation units are hospital areas dedicated to the ongoing evaluation and management of patients for a brief period of time for well-defined conditions. We describe the implementation of a paediatric observation unit (POU) adjacent to a paediatric emergency department (PED) in an urban, academic, community hospital.MethodsStaffing models were designed to provide paediatric services to patients in both the PED and POU. Admission criteria, workflow and transfer guidelines were developed. Quality improvement initiatives were undertaken and evaluated. Unit throughput, patient outcomes and patient satisfaction data were collected and analysed.ResultsOver a 2-year period, there were 24 038 patient visits to the PED. Of these, 1215 (5.1%) patients required admission. Seven hundred and seventy-seven (64.0%) of these children were admitted to the POU. One hundred and nineteen (15.3%) of these patients were subsequently converted to inpatient hospitalisation. The average length of stay (LOS) was 25.7 hours in 2017 and 26.5 hours in 2018. Ten patients returned to the PED within 72 hours of discharge from the POU and four were readmitted. Patient satisfaction scores regarding ‘likelihood to recommend’ improved from the 36th to the 92nd percentile rank over a 1-year period. Close monitoring of patient outcomes allowed for the adjustment of admission guidelines, increased unit census and optimised utilisation.ConclusionA combined PED-POU has been successful at our institution in meeting benchmark goals set for LOS and conversion rates. In addition, quality improvement interventions increased patient census and improved patient satisfaction scores while reducing the inpatient burden on the referring children’s hospital.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 973-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Drago ◽  
G. Gasparini ◽  
A. Signori ◽  
C. Campisi ◽  
E. Cozzani ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh D. Mistry ◽  
Alexander W. Hirsch ◽  
Ashley L. Woodford ◽  
Megan Lundy

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gül Pamukçu Günaydın ◽  
Hatice Duygu Çiftçi Sivri ◽  
Serkan Sivri ◽  
Yavuz Otal ◽  
Ayhan Özhasenekler ◽  
...  

Introduction. We present a case of concurrent spontaneous sublingual and intramural small bowel hematoma due to warfarin anticoagulation.Case. A 71-year-old man presented to the emergency department complaining of a swollen, painful tongue. He was on warfarin therapy. Physical examination revealed sublingual hematoma. His international normalized ratio was 11.9. The computed tomography scan of the neck demonstrated sublingual hematoma. He was admitted to emergency department observation unit, monitored closely; anticoagulation was reversed with fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K. 26 hours after his arrival to the emergency department, his abdominal pain and melena started. His abdomen tomography demonstrated intestinal submucosal hemorrhage in the ileum. He was admitted to surgical floor, monitored closely, and discharged on day 4.Conclusion. Since the patient did not have airway compromise holding anticoagulant, reversing anticoagulation, close monitoring and observation were enough for management of both sublingual and spontaneous intramural small bowel hematoma.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Dorsey ◽  
Eric Harrington ◽  
W.F. Peacock ◽  
Charles Emerman

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Marshall ◽  
Robert Katzer ◽  
Shahram Lotfipour ◽  
Bharath Chakravarthy ◽  
Siri Shastry ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Zucchelli ◽  
R. Apuzzo ◽  
C. Paolillo ◽  
V. Prestipino ◽  
S. De Bianchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Delirium is frequent though undetected in older patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). Aims To develop and validate a delirium risk assessment tool for older persons admitted to the ED Observation Unit (OU). Methods We used data from two samples of 65 + year-old patients, one admitted to the ED of Brescia Hospital (n = 257) and one to the ED of Desio Hospital (n = 107), Italy. Data from Brescia were used as training sample, those collected in Desio as testing one. Delirium was assessed using the 4AT and patients’ characteristic were retrieved from medical charts. Variables found to be associated with delirium in the training sample were tested for the creation of a delirium risk assessment tool. The resulting tool’s performances were assessed in the testing subsample. Results Of all possible scores tested, the combination with the highest discriminative ability in the training sample included: age ≥ 75 years, dementia diagnosis, chronic use of neuroleptics, and hearing impairment. The delirium score exhibited an AUC of 0.874 and 0.893 in the training and testing samples, respectively. For a 1-point increase in the score, the odds of delirium increased more than twice in both samples. Discussion We propose a delirium risk assessing tool that includes variables that can be easily collected at ED admission and that can be calculated rapidly. Conclusion A risk assessment tool could help improving delirium detection in older persons referring to ED.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document