Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Germ Cell Tumors (GCT)

2008 ◽  
pp. 305-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. De Santis ◽  
A. Maj-Hes ◽  
M. Bachner
Urology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 808-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Albers ◽  
Hans Bender ◽  
Hasan Yilmaz ◽  
Georg Schoeneich ◽  
Hans-Juergen Biersack ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Tsatalpas ◽  
Bettina Beuthien-Baumann ◽  
Joachim Kropp ◽  
Andreas Manseck ◽  
Claudia Tiepolt ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3090-3095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Huddart ◽  
Michael J. O'Doherty ◽  
Anwar Padhani ◽  
Gordon J.S. Rustin ◽  
Graham M. Mead ◽  
...  

Purpose There are several management options for patients with clinical stage I (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT); this study examined whether an 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET) scan could identify patients without occult metastatic disease for whom surveillance is an attractive option. Methods High-risk (lymphovascular invasion positive) patients with CS1 NSGCT underwent 18FDG PET scanning within 8 weeks of orchidectomy or marker normalization. PET-positive patients went off study; PET-negative patients were observed on a surveillance program. The primary outcome measure was the 2-year relapse-free rate (RFR) in patients with a negative PET scan (the negative predictive value). Assuming an RFR of 90% to exclude an RFR less than 80% with approximately 90% power, 100 PET-negative patients were required; 135 scanned patients were anticipated. Results Patients were registered between May 2002 and January 2005, when the trial was stopped by the independent data monitoring committee due to an unacceptably high relapse rate in the PET-negative patients. Of 116 registered patients, 111 underwent PET scans, and 88 (79%) were PET-negative (61% of preorchidectomy marker–negative patients v 88% of marker-positive patients; P = .002); 87 proceeded to surveillance, and one requested adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 12 months, 33 of 87 patients on surveillance relapsed (1-year RFR, 63%; 90% CI, 54% to 72%). Conclusion Though PET identified some patients with disease not detected by computed tomography scan, the relapse rate among PET negative patients remains high. The results show that 18FDG PET scanning is not sufficiently sensitive to identify patients at low risk of relapse in this setting.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Buchler ◽  
Katerina Simonova ◽  
Pavel Fencl ◽  
Jiri Jarkovsky ◽  
Jitka Abrahamova

2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Kelly ◽  
Karl Metcalfe ◽  
Jane Evanson ◽  
Ian Sabin ◽  
P. Nicholas Plowman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document