Hydrocarbon Potential in Southeastern United States

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Brewer
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Hydrocarbon Potential

Reviews

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 893-894
Author(s):  
Edward S. Krebes ◽  
Ray Wood ◽  
Patrick Taylor
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Array Processing ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Scientific Integrity ◽  
Hydrocarbon Potential ◽  
American Geophysical ◽  
American Geophysical Union

Fundamentals of Spherical Array Processing, second edition, by Boaz Rafaely, ISBN 978-3-319-99560-1, 2019, Springer, 193 p. Scientific Integrity and Ethics in the Geosciences, by Linda C. Gundersen, ISBN 978-1-119-06778-8, 2017, American Geophysical Union, 344 p. Hydrocarbon Potential in Southeastern United States, by Robert J. Brewer, ISBN 978-3-030-00216-9, 2019, Springer, 89 p.

Does Enhancing Mind Perception Affect Conspiracy Belief?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Noguera
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Social Discourse ◽  
Psychological Processes ◽  
Social Psychological ◽  
Conspiracy Theories ◽  
Mind Perception ◽  
Mixed Anova ◽  
Interaction Term ◽  
The Mind

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel mind perception manipulation. Mind perception is currently theorized to be an essential aspect of a number of human social psychological processes. Thus, a successful manipulation would allow for the causal study of those processes. This manipulation was created in an attempt to explore the downstream impact of mind perception on the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are steadily becoming more and more prominent in social discourse. Endorsement of conspiracy theories are beginning to show real world ramifications such as a danger to human health (e.g., in the anti-vaccination movement). A sample of college students (valid N = 53) from a large rural institution in the southeastern United States participated for course credit. These participants completed a mind perception pretest, were randomly assigned to either the manipulation in question (in which participants are asked to consider the ‘mind’ of several targets and write their thoughts about them) or the control condition, and then they completed a posttest. The mixed ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between Time and Condition was not significant. Because the manipulation did not work, other analyses were aborted, in accord with the pre-registration. My Discussion focuses on the procedures and potential shortcomings of this manipulation, in an effort to lay the groundwork for a successful one.

Selected fluvial monazite deposits in the southeastern United States

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Overstreet ◽  
A.M. White ◽  
P.K. Theobald ◽  
D.W. Caldwell
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States

Estimated potentiometric surface for the Tertiary limestone aquifer system, southeastern United States, prior to development

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Johnston ◽  
R.E. Krause ◽  
F.W. Meyer ◽  
P.D. Ryder ◽  
C.H. Tibbals ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Southeastern United States ◽  
Limestone Aquifer ◽  
Aquifer System ◽  
Potentiometric Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document