Center of Mass and Postural Adaptations During Robotic Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

Author(s):  
Arvind Ramanujam ◽  
Kamyar Momeni ◽  
Syed R. Husain ◽  
Jonathan Augustine ◽  
Erica Garbarini ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 935-939
Author(s):  
A. Megía-García ◽  
A. J. del-Ama ◽  
V. Lozano-Berrio ◽  
I. Sinovas-Alonso ◽  
N. Comino-Suárez ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen W. Heinemann ◽  
Arun Jayaraman ◽  
Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty ◽  
Jamal Spraggins ◽  
Daniel Pinto ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. Lemaire ◽  
Andrew J. Smith ◽  
Andrew Herbert-Copley ◽  
Vidya Sreenivasan

Author(s):  
Wendy L. Ochs ◽  
Jane Woodward ◽  
Tara Cornwell ◽  
Keith E. Gordon

Abstract Background Many people with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) have the ability to maneuver while walking. However, neuromuscular impairments create challenges to maintain stability. How people with iSCI maintain stability during walking maneuvers is poorly understood. Thus, this study compares maneuver performance in varying external conditions between persons with and without iSCI to better understand maneuver stabilization strategies in people with iSCI. Methods Participants with and without iSCI walked on a wide treadmill and were prompted to perform lateral maneuvers between bouts of straight walking. Lateral force fields applied to the participants’ center of mass amplified or attenuated the participants’ movements, thereby increasing the capability of the study to capture behavior at varied levels of challenge to stability. Results By examining metrics of stability, step width, and center of mass dynamics, distinct strategies emerged following iSCI. The minimum margin of stability (MOSmin) on each step during maneuvers indicated persons with iSCI generally adapted to amplified and attenuated force fields with increased stability compared to persons without iSCI, particularly using increased step width and reduced center of mass excursion on maneuver initiation. In the amplified field, however, persons with iSCI had a reduced MOSmin when terminating a maneuver, likely due to the challenge of the force field opposing the necessary lateral braking. Persons without iSCI were more likely to rely on or oppose the force field when appropriate for movement execution. Compared to persons with iSCI, they reduced their MOSmin to initiate maneuvers in the attenuated and amplified fields and increased their MOSmin to arrest maneuvers in the amplified field. Conclusions The different force fields were successful in identifying relatively subtle strategy differences between persons with and without iSCI. Specifically, persons with iSCI adopted increased step width and reduction in center of mass excursion to increase maneuver stability in the amplified field. The amplified field may provoke practice of stable and efficient initiation and arrest of walking maneuvers. Overall, this work allows better framing of the stability mechanisms used following iSCI to perform walking maneuvers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Cornwell ◽  
Jane Woodward ◽  
Wendy Ochs ◽  
Keith E. Gordon

Gait rehabilitation following incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) often aims to enhance speed and stability. Concurrently increasing both may be difficult though as certain stabilization strategies will be compromised at faster speeds. To evaluate the interaction between speed and lateral stability, we examined individuals with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) iSCI as they performed straight walking and lateral maneuvers at Preferred and Fast treadmill speeds. To better detect the effects of speed on stability, we challenged lateral stability with a movement amplification force field. The Amplification field, created by a cable-driven robot, applied lateral forces to the pelvis that were proportional to the real-time lateral center of mass (COM) velocity. While we expected individuals to maintain stability during straight walking at the Fast speed in normal conditions, we hypothesized that both groups would be less stable in the Amplification field at the Fast speed compared to the Preferred. However, we found no effects of speed or the interaction between speed and field on straight-walking stability [Lyapunov exponent or lateral margin of stability (MOS)]. Across all trials at the Fast speed compared to the Preferred, there was greater step width variability (p = 0.031) and a stronger correlation between lateral COM state at midstance and the subsequent lateral foot placement. These observations suggest that increased stepping variability at faster speeds may be beneficial for COM control. We hypothesized that during lateral maneuvers in the Amplification field, MOS on the Initiation and Termination steps would be smaller at the Fast speed than at the Preferred. We found no effect of speed on the Initiation step MOS within either field (p > 0.350) or group (p > 0.200). The Termination step MOS decreased at the Fast speed within the group without iSCI (p < 0.001), indicating a trade-off between lateral stability and forward walking speed. Unexpectedly, participants took more steps and time to complete maneuvers at the Fast treadmill speed in the Amplification field. This strategy prioritizing stability over speed was especially evident in the group with iSCI. Overall, individuals with iSCI were able to maintain lateral stability when walking fast in balance-challenging conditions but may have employed more cautious maneuver strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document