Newer Political Systems Yielding Valuable Insights Concerning Consociation: South Africa and Northern Ireland

2019 ◽  
pp. 269-339
Author(s):  
Brighid Brooks Kelly
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Political Systems

Normative Influences on Intergroup Attitudes in Northern Ireland and South Africa

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diala R. Hawi ◽  
Linda R. Tropp ◽  
David A. Butz ◽  
Mirona A. Gheorghiu ◽  
Alexandra M. Zetes
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Intergroup Attitudes ◽  
Normative Influences

The Limits to Coercive Consociationalism in Northern Ireland

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan O'Leary
Keyword(s):  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Political Systems ◽  
Irish History ◽  
Northern Ireland Conflict

The merits of consociation as a means of solving the Northern Ireland conflict are presented through contrasting it with other ways of stabilizing highly divided political systems. Why voluntary consociation has been unsuccessful in Northern Ireland and unfortunately is likely to remain so is explained. The signing of the Anglo-Irish Agreement (AIA) must be understood against the background of the failure of previous consociational experiments. The AIA partly represented a shift in British strategy from voluntary to coercive consociationalism. The prospects for this coercive consociational strategy and variants on it are evaluated. Irish history is something Irishmen should never remember, and Englishmen should never forget.

Claviceps purpurea. [Distribution map].

1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
South America ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Rio Grande ◽  
Claviceps Purpurea ◽  
Rio Grande Do Sul ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Claviceps purpurea (Fr.). Tul. Hosts: Rye (Seale cereale), other cereals and Gramineae. Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, Algeria, Canary Islands, Ethiopia, Guinea, Kenya, Malawi, Mauritius, Morocco, Rhodesia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, ASIA, China, India (Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Madras, Mysore), Iran, Israel, Japan, Korea, Nepal, Philippines, Turkey, USSR (Siberia), AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia, New Zealand, EUROPE, Austria, Belgium, Britain and Northern Ireland, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Faroes, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Irish Republic, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, USSR (general), Yugoslavia, NORTH AMERICA, Canada (general), Mexico, USA, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina, Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul), Chile, Colombia, Peru, Tristan da Cunha, Uruguay.

Pyrenophora avenae. [Distribution map].

1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
North America ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
South America ◽  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Buenos Aires ◽  
Far East ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Pyrenophora avenae Ito & Kuribay. Hosts: Oats (Avena). Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, Angola, Egypt, Kenya, Malagasy Republic, Morocco, South Africa, ASIA, China (Kiangsu), India, Israel, Japan, Nepal, Pakistan, Taiwan, Turkey, USSR (Soviet Far East, Tashkent, Tomsk), AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia, New Zealand, EUROPE, Austria, Britain & Northern Ireland, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Irish Republic, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Sweden, USSR (Latvia) (Byelorussia), NORTH AMERICA, Canada (general), USA (general), SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina (Buenos Aires), Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala.

Ascochyta pisi. [Distribution map].

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
South Africa ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Central America ◽  
West Indies ◽  
Broad Bean ◽  
Distribution Map ◽  
Ascochyta Pisi ◽  
New Distribution

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Ascochyta pisi Lib. Hosts: Pea (Pisum sativum), broad bean (Vicia faba), lucerne (Medicago sativa), etc. Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, Angola, Ethiopia, Congo, Canary Islands, Kenya, Libya, Malawi, Mauritius, Morocco, Rhodesia, South Africa, Tanzania (Tanganyika), Uganda, Zambia, ASIA, Afghanistan, Ceylon, China (Yunnan) (general incl. Kwangsi, Kiangsu), Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Korea, Lebanon, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, Taiwan (Formosa), Turkey, USSR (Armenia) (Caucasus) (Tashkent) (Kazakhstan) (Kirghizistan), AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, Australia, New Zealand, Papua & New Guinea, EUROPE, Austria, Belgium, Britain & Northern Ireland, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Irish Republic, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, USSR (general with hosts), Yugoslavia, NORTH AMERICA, Bermuda, Canada (general), Mexico, United States (general incl. Alaska), CENTRAL AMERICA & WEST INDIES, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Jamaica, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil (Espirito Santo, Minas Gerae, Pernambuco), Chile, Colombia, Peru, Venezuela.

‘I Have Heard from Some Teachers’: the Second-Century Struggle for Forgiveness and Reconciliation

2004 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 5-28
Author(s):  
Christine Trevett
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Second Century ◽  
First Century ◽  
Truth And Reconciliation ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Fictive Kinship ◽  
Twenty First Century ◽  
Brothers And Sisters ◽  
Forgiveness And Reconciliation

In the close-knit valleys communities of South Wales where I was brought up, some fingers are still pointed at ‘the scab’, the miner who, for whatever reason, did not show solidarity in the strike of 1984-5, cement the definition between ‘them’ and ‘us’. In trouble-torn Palestine of the twenty-first century, or among the paramilitary groups of Northern Ireland today, suspected informers are summarily assassinated. In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Committee continues its work in the post-apartheid era. In second-century Rome and elsewhere, the ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’ who made up the fictive kinship groups – the churches – in the growing but illicit cult of the Christians were conscious both of their own vulnerability to outside opinion and of their failures in relation to their co-religionists. The questions which they asked, too, were questions about reconciliation and/or (spiritual) death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document