When Students Generate Questions: Participatory-Based Reading Instruction in Elementary Classrooms

Author(s):  
Molly Ness
2021 ◽  
pp. 174462952110161
Author(s):  
Rachel Sermier Dessemontet ◽  
Anne-Laure Linder ◽  
Catherine Martinet ◽  
Britt-Marie Martini-Willemin

Little is known about the content and quality of reading instruction provided to students with intellectual disability. This study aimed to describe the reading instruction provided to students with intellectual disability who were not yet readers in self-contained elementary classrooms. The teachers of 24 classrooms participated in the study. Systematic observations of reading lessons, follow-up interviews with the teachers, review of teaching material, and content analysis of students’ individualized education plans were conducted. Findings indicate that phonics and phonological awareness were taught in most of the classrooms. However, phonics was taught systematically, as recommended in the research, in only less than half of the classes. Sight-word instruction and vocabulary instruction were observed in more than half of the classes. Comprehension instruction of texts read aloud by the teacher was observed in only about a third of the classrooms. Recommendations to support teachers in enhancing the quality of reading instruction are provided.


1981 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaea Leinhardt ◽  
Naomi Zigmond ◽  
William W. Cooley

Reading instruction and its effects were examined for 105 students in elementary classrooms for the learning-disabled. Extensive detailed observations of students, teachers, and instructional material were used to explore the plausibility of a causal model of the effects of reading behaviors and instruction on students' reading performance. The results indicate that 72 percent of the variance in posttest reading scores can be explained by a model that includes a pretest, three student reading behaviors, and instructional overlap; and that 59 percent of the variance in student time spent in reading can be explained by a model that includes pretest, teacher instructional behaviors, teacher affective behaviors, and instructional pacing. Using these results as a basis, mechanisms for increasing salient student reading activities in classrooms that serve students with reading problems are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1947-1957
Author(s):  
Alexandra Hollo ◽  
Johanna L. Staubitz ◽  
Jason C. Chow

Purpose Although sampling teachers' child-directed speech in school settings is needed to understand the influence of linguistic input on child outcomes, empirical guidance for measurement procedures needed to obtain representative samples is lacking. To optimize resources needed to transcribe, code, and analyze classroom samples, this exploratory study assessed the minimum number and duration of samples needed for a reliable analysis of conventional and researcher-developed measures of teacher talk in elementary classrooms. Method This study applied fully crossed, Person (teacher) × Session (samples obtained on 3 separate occasions) generalizability studies to analyze an extant data set of three 10-min language samples provided by 28 general and special education teachers recorded during large-group instruction across the school year. Subsequently, a series of decision studies estimated of the number and duration of sessions needed to obtain the criterion g coefficient ( g > .70). Results The most stable variables were total number of words and mazes, requiring only a single 10-min sample, two 6-min samples, or three 3-min samples to reach criterion. No measured variables related to content or complexity were adequately stable regardless of number and duration of samples. Conclusions Generalizability studies confirmed that a large proportion of variance was attributable to individuals rather than the sampling occasion when analyzing the amount and fluency of spontaneous teacher talk. In general, conventionally reported outcomes were more stable than researcher-developed codes, which suggests some categories of teacher talk are more context dependent than others and thus require more intensive data collection to measure reliably.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deisy De Souza ◽  
Julio De Rose ◽  
Renato Bortoloti ◽  
Janaina Labadessa ◽  
Thaize De Souza Reis ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Roux ◽  
Jorge E. Gonzalez ◽  
Deborah C. Simmons ◽  
Sharolyn Pollard-Durodola ◽  
Vivina Y. Rivera ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amanda P. Goodwin ◽  
Sun-Joo Cho ◽  
Dan Reynolds ◽  
Rebecca Silverman ◽  
Stephanie Nunn

2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Marchand-Martella ◽  
Ronald Martella

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document