Differentiated reading instruction: Using the Multiple Intelligences and The MIDAS to enhance comprehension, enthusiasm and strategic reading approaches

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branton Shearer ◽  
Sara Reith
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelmina van Dijk ◽  
Chris Schatschneider ◽  
Stephanie Al Otaiba ◽  
Sara Ann Hart

Background: For most instruction, there are individual differences in responsiveness, resulting in some children benefitting less than others. These child by instruction interactions have been shown to exist in reading instruction and interventions through cognitive factors. Student behavior, however, may be of influence in response to instruction and intervention, since it impedes with students’ ability to focus and attend to instruction.Methods: The potential moderation of students’ behavior ratings on reading instruction effectiveness was estimated on a data set including 3,024 students in K-3. Data came from eight independent studies evaluating multi-component reading approaches and were pooled using integrative data analysis. We estimated the interaction of student behavior ratings on treatment effectiveness both at the within and between classroom level.Results: Multicomponent reading approaches were effective in improving reading scores (b=0.48, p=.017, d=0.08). However, students with behavior ratings outside the average did not benefit from the approaches, while students with average ratings did benefit (range of behavior ratings: -1.61 – 0.68). At the classroom level, students in classrooms with a lower average of problem behaviors did not benefit from these approaches (average classroom behavior rating > -0.14).Conclusions: Our findings suggest behavioral characteristics of students are of influence on the effectiveness of multi-component reading approaches. In particular, students with problem behaviors do not benefit from reading instruction and intervention and may need additional supports.


2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Caverly ◽  
Sheila A. Nicholson ◽  
Richard Radcliffe

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (48) ◽  
pp. 283-300
Author(s):  
Jagoda Topalov ◽  

The aim of this paper is to determine the effects of Collaborative strategic reading (CSR), an instructional framework designed to improve students’ reading skills (Klingner, Vaughn 1999), on EFL learners’ inventory of reading strategies and the frequency of its use. In a quasi-experimental pre-test – post-test study with a control group, the participants were, over two semesters, exposed to strategic reading instruction in either a cooperative or an individual setting. A series of mixed between-within repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted in order to see whether there were differences in the use of reading strategies between the students from the two groups, as well as between the same students tested at three different times (at baseline, at the middle of the experiment, and upon the completion of the experiment). The results indicate that the cooperative setting has a statistical effect on the use of strategies employed during and after reading academic texts, but not before. The results further show that the students from the experimental group reported significantly more self-regulatory behaviors than the students from the control group upon the completion of the experiment, but not at its middle, suggesting that prolonged exposure to experimental input is necessary for the effects of group-work dynamics to become visible and the strategic framework to become internalized. Pedagogical implications of the results mainly address the potential of group-work dynamics in offering an effective alternative to typical teacher-centered EFL instruction found in most university contexts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Indah Welasasih Ludji

Explicit instruction of reading strategies has often been recommended to develop L2 or EFL learners with poor reading performance. This paper aims to examine how effective the approach is when it is combined with a diagnostic assessment tool, both on participants’ reading performance at literal and inferential levels, and participants’ attitudes towards reading. The experimental study involved two groups of 9 grade students in West Manggarai, East Nusa Tenggara who were identified as low-level readers. The findings reveal that while both control and experimental groups made significant progress in their reading performance, the experimental group yielded larger effect size than the control group. It is concluded that the use of diagnostic assessment tool was proven to be instrumental in extending the participants’ reading performance. Classroom implications and suggestions for future research are provided based on the aforementioned findings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mienke Droop ◽  
Willy van Elsäcker ◽  
Marinus J. M. Voeten ◽  
Ludo Verhoeven

Author(s):  
Mahmood Kazemi ◽  
Mohsen Hosseini ◽  
Mohammadreza Kohandani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document