User Experience Evaluation of Intelligent Tunnel Digital Monitoring Interface Based on Cognitive Psychology

Author(s):  
Lei Wu ◽  
Yao Su ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Lijun Mou ◽  
Yue Sun ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tobias Grundgeiger ◽  
Jörn Hurtienne ◽  
Oliver Happel

Objective: To highlight the importance of the personal experience of users who interact with technology in safety-critical domains and summarize three interaction concepts and the associated theories that provide the means for addressing user experience. Background: In health care, the dominant concepts of interaction are based on theories arising from classic cognitive psychology. These concepts focus mainly on safety and efficiency, with too little consideration being given to user experience. Method: Users in complex socio-technical and safety-critical domains such as health care interact with many technological devices. Enhancing the user experience could improve the design of technology, enhance the well-being of staff, and contribute to modern safety management. We summarize concepts of “interaction” based on modern theories of human–computer interaction, which include the personal experience of users as an important construct. Results and Conclusion: Activity theory, embodiment, and interaction as experience provide a theoretical foundation for considering user experience in safety-critical domains. Using an example from anesthesiology, we demonstrate how each theory provides a unique but complementary view on experience. Finally, the methodological possibilities for considering personal experience in design and evaluations vary among the theories. Application: Considering user experience in health care and potentially other safety-critical domains can provide an additional means of optimizing interaction with technology, contributing to the well-being of staff, and improving safety.


Author(s):  
Emmanuel Eilu

User Experience assessment is an evaluation of user's experience with the product, system or service during ‘use' (i.e., actual interaction experience) as well as ‘anticipated or before use' (i.e., pre-interaction experience).Whereas many user experience researchers may be conversant with explaining a person's experience during use of a product, system or service, they find it difficult to explain experience before a product or service is used (Anticipated Use), which in this chapter is referred to as Anticipated User Experience (AUX). This chapter applies the theory of cognitive psychology and its principles to best explain how Anticipated User Experience occurs and how this experience can be achieved. This chapter goes a long way in informing user experience researchers and practitioners on the relevance of attaining AUX in a computing product and how it can be achieved.


Author(s):  
Kurnia Manggali Utamaningrum ◽  
Wahyu Andhyka ◽  
Evi Dwi Wahyuni

 The implementation of the academic information services, UMM has been trying to present some system of academic services for the various students needs, one of the highlights is KRS-Online system because it is the most frequently used system of students in programming courses in each semester.Complaints and suggestions certainly are reasonable for the system services are used by many people.This study aimed to KRS-Online users’ convenience can be measured empirically based indicators of variable users’ experience and cognitive psychology to prove whether these two variables can affect the users’ convenience.Based on this research, it has been proved that the users’ experience and cognitive psychology significantly affect both users’ convenience variables partially tested individually or simultaneously or together. 


Author(s):  
Emmanuel Eilu

User Experience assessment is an evaluation of user's experience with the product, system or service during ‘use' (i.e., actual interaction experience) as well as ‘anticipated or before use' (i.e., pre-interaction experience).Whereas many user experience researchers may be conversant with explaining a person's experience during use of a product, system or service, they find it difficult to explain experience before a product or service is used (Anticipated Use), which in this chapter is referred to as Anticipated User Experience (AUX). This chapter applies the theory of cognitive psychology and its principles to best explain how Anticipated User Experience occurs and how this experience can be achieved. This chapter goes a long way in informing user experience researchers and practitioners on the relevance of attaining AUX in a computing product and how it can be achieved.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khristian Edi Nugroho Soebandrija

Business innovation is one of the factors driving a company for providing values for stakeholders toward sustainable competitive advantages. The mentioned values vis-à- vis not merely internal stakeholders, but also external stakeholders. Subsequently, this paper elaborates grand theory within stakeholders theory. The mentioned sustainable competitive advantages are achieved through the disruptive innovation that revamps the constellation of sustainable competitive advantages. The disruptive innovation is implemented and intertwined through industry 4.0 that covers trilogy of physical, digital, and biology. Subsequently, the mentioned implementation is geared toward benefits of Making Indonesia 4.0 through Indonesia local wisdom and setting. Precisely, it further elaborates the Product Design Engineering (PDE). This PDE discipline incorporates the concept of its evolutionary theories from cognitive psychology; human factors in product design; Kansei engineering; emotional design; affective engineering; and user experience design. Keywords: affective engineering; cognitive psychology; disruptive innovation; Kansei engineering; user empathy


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Norman

A series of vignette examples taken from psychological research on motivation, emotion, decision making, and attitudes illustrates how the influence of unconscious processes is often measured in a range of different behaviors. However, the selected studies share an apparent lack of explicit operational definition of what is meant by consciousness, and there seems to be substantial disagreement about the properties of conscious versus unconscious processing: Consciousness is sometimes equated with attention, sometimes with verbal report ability, and sometimes operationalized in terms of behavioral dissociations between different performance measures. Moreover, the examples all seem to share a dichotomous view of conscious and unconscious processes as being qualitatively different. It is suggested that cognitive research on consciousness can help resolve the apparent disagreement about how to define and measure unconscious processing, as is illustrated by a selection of operational definitions and empirical findings from modern cognitive psychology. These empirical findings also point to the existence of intermediate states of conscious awareness, not easily classifiable as either purely conscious or purely unconscious. Recent hypotheses from cognitive psychology, supplemented with models from social, developmental, and clinical psychology, are then presented all of which are compatible with the view of consciousness as a graded rather than an all-or-none phenomenon. Such a view of consciousness would open up for explorations of intermediate states of awareness in addition to more purely conscious or purely unconscious states and thereby increase our understanding of the seemingly “unconscious” aspects of mental life.


1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1181-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sternberg
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-593
Author(s):  
Leroy H. Pelton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document