Usage Analytics: A Process to Extract and Analyse Usage Data to Understand User Behaviour in Cloud

Author(s):  
Manoj Kesavulu ◽  
Duc-Tien Dang-Nguyen ◽  
Marija Bezbradica ◽  
Markus Helfert
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Leski ◽  
Sławomir Klimaszewski ◽  
Marcin Kurdelski

Author(s):  
Rebecca Lubas ◽  
Sydney Thompson ◽  
Lauren Wittek
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Nandit Malviya ◽  
Mukta S. Takalikar
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dexter Hunt ◽  
Sarah Zadeh ◽  
Chris Rogers
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Carbone

AbstractAlone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies1. Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals’ use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions’ legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017–18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan

Abstract The popularity of self-service technologies, particularly in the banking industry, more precisely with electronic banking channel services, has undergone a major change as individuals' lifestyles develop. This change has affected individuals’ decisions about accepting any new Information Technology, and Information Communications Technology services that are electronically mediated, for example, E-Banking channel services. This study investigates the effect of Individual Factors on User Behaviour, and the moderating role of Trust in the relationship between Individual Factors, and User Behaviour based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. This research proposes a model, with a second-order components research framework. It improves current explanations of the acceptance of electronic banking channel services. Furthermore, this study highlights the role of trust on the acceptance of electronic banking channel services, which is the most crucial consideration in customers’ decisions to accept electronic banking channels services. Thus, trust is the spine of the system in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Data were collected using an online questionnaire that received 476 valid responses from academic staff who work at the University of Sulaimani. The model tested data using the Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling approach. The results show that Individual Factors have a positive effect on User Behaviour. Besides, results show that trust moderates the relationship between Individual Factors and User Behaviour.


Author(s):  
Gian-Luca Savino ◽  
Laura Meyer ◽  
Eve Emily Sophie Schade ◽  
Thora Tenbrink ◽  
Johannes Schöning
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document