Elementary Divisor Domains as Endomorphism Rings

Author(s):  
László Fuchs
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Cortés-Izurdiaga ◽  
Pedro A. Guil Asensio ◽  
D. Keskin Tütüncü ◽  
Ashish K. Srivastava
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Claus Fieker ◽  
Tommy Hofmann ◽  
Sogo Pierre Sanon

1974 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1380-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Shores ◽  
Roger Wiegand

Recall that a ring R (all rings considered are commutative with unit) is an elementary divisor ring (respectively, a Hermite ring) provided every matrix over R is equivalent to a diagonal matrix (respectively, a triangular matrix). Thus, every elementary divisor ring is Hermite, and it is easily seen that a Hermite ring is Bezout, that is, finitely generated ideals are principal. Examples have been given [4] to show that neither implication is reversible.


1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-353
Author(s):  
B. V. Zabavskii
Keyword(s):  

1965 ◽  
Vol 159 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Gewirtzman

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Balaba ◽  
A. V. Mikhalev

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 635-648
Author(s):  
Xavier Vidaux

AbstractLet K and K′ be two elliptic fields with complex multiplication over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic 0. non k-isomorphic, and let C and C′ be two curves with respectively K and K′ as function fields. We prove that if the endomorphism rings of the curves are not isomorphic then K and K′ are not elementarily equivalent in the language of fields expanded with a constant symbol (the modular invariant). This theorem is an analogue of a theorem from David A. Pierce in the language of k-algebras.


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 4911-4924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simion Breaz

1972 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Brenner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document