Interventional Pain Management Procedures

2020 ◽  
pp. 523-653
Author(s):  
Gabor Bela Racz ◽  
Gabor J. Racz ◽  
Tibor A. Racz
2008 ◽  
Vol 1;11 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
YiLi Zhou

Background: A recent study has indicated that quality assurance for interventional pain management procedures (IPMPs) can be achieved in university pain clinics. However, the issue of quality assurance for IPMPs in private practice has not yet been addressed. Objective: This study was designed to monitor the quality of IPMPs in a private pain practice in north Florida. Methods: From November 2005 to July 2006, we monitored the quality of IPMPs in a private pain practice in north Florida. Questionnaires regarding degree of pain relief, patient satisfaction, and complications were handed to patients immediately after the completion of each IPMP. Follow-up phone calls were also made to patients 1 day after the IPMPs. Results: A total of 771 (male: 249, female: 522) patients with a mean age of 58.1 years participated in the study. Office-based IPMPs included lumbar and cervical epidural steroid injections, lumbar and cervical facet joint blocks, selective nerve root blocks, lumbar and cervical sympathetic nerve blocks, sacroiliac joint injection, and large joint injections. Seven-hundred patients (90.8%) reported various degrees of pain relief immediately following IPMPs. Average pain score decreased by 4.3 on a 0 to 10 scale (p=<0.001). Number needed to be treated (NNT) to reach 50% or more pain relief immediately after IPMPs was 1.4. Six-hundred ninety-two (89.7%) patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the results of IPMPs. sixty-two patients (8%) developed headaches after IPMPs, which lasted from 30 minutes to 4 days. None of these patients required a blood patch. Five patients developed moderate vasovagal responses during IPMPs, in which their heart rates decreased to <45/min, BP <90/60mmHg. The IPMPs were aborted immediately. All of these patients recovered uneventfully within a few minutes. No other serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The results of the current study suggest that high quality private interventional pain programs with high efficacy, high patient satisfaction, and low complication rates can be achieved through appropriate staff training, proper monitoring of patients during IPMPs, and adequate handling of patients after the IPMPs. Key words: Interventional pain management procedures, quality assurance, efficacy, patient satisfaction


2016 ◽  
Vol 7;19 (7;9) ◽  
pp. E957-E984
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

In the face of the progressive implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a significant regulatory regime, and the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its proposed 2017 hospital outpatient department (HOPD) and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) payment rules on July 14, 2016, and the physician payment schedule was released July 15, 2016. U.S. health care costs continue to increase, occupying 17.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2014 and surpassing $3 trillion in overall health care expenditure. Solo and independent practices face unique challenges and many are being acquired by hospitals or larger groups. This transfer of services to hospital settings is indisputably leading to an increase in the net cost to the system. Comparison of facility payments for interventional techniques in HOPD, ASC, and in-office settings shows wide variation for multiple interventional techniques. Major discrepancies in payment schedules are related to higher payments for hospitals than comparable treatments in in-office settings and ASCs. In-office procedures, which have been converted to ASC procedures, are reimbursed at as high as 1,366% higher than ASCs and 2,156% higher than in-office settings. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) has made recommendations on avoiding the discrepancies and site-of-service differentials in in-office settings, hospital outpatient settings, and ASCs. These have not been implemented by CMS. In addition, there have been slow reductions in reimbursements over the recent years, which continue to accumulate, leading to significant reductions in payments In conclusion, equalization of site-of-service differentials will simultaneously improve reimbursement patterns for interventional pain management procedures, increase access and quality of care, and finally, reduce costs for CMS, extending Medicare solvency. Key words: Hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, physician inoffice services, interventional pain management, interventional techniques


2008 ◽  
Vol 6;11 (12;6) ◽  
pp. 917-920
Author(s):  
Ramsin Benyamin

Background: Synthetic corticosteroids are commonly utilized in interventional pain management procedures. These substances have potential side-effects including psychological adverse events. Objective: We describe a case of substance-induced psychotic disorder resulting from corticosteroids administration. Design: Case Report Methods: We describe a 67-year-old male that, six months prior to being consulted at our center, received a cervical epidural, 4 level medial branch blocks, 4 trigger point injections and a tendon injection in the shoulder all including corticosteroids all in one treatment session. Results: Approximately 7 days following the multiple injections, the patient developed psychotic episodes including racing thoughts, anger, agitation, pressured hyperverbal speech and paranoia. The symptoms spontaneously resolved in approximately 7-10 days. Discussion: Although well known as a potential complication, corticosteroid induced psychosis secondary to interventional pain procedures have never been reported. We further discuss this potential side effect of utilizing corticosteroids and emphasize the need for guidelines regarding steroid utilization. Key words: Steroid, corticosteroid, psychosis, psychotic disorder


2020 ◽  
Vol 5;23 (9;5) ◽  
pp. E451-E459
Author(s):  
Uri Hochberg

Background: Interventional procedures are offered routinely to patients seen in McGill University’s interdisciplinary cancer pain management program. However, publications on these procedures are scarce, making it difficult to predict which patients may benefit from them. Objectives: We hypothesized that interventional pain procedures offered to cancer patients could provide relief of pain as well as other symptoms. Furthermore, some variables may predict the efficacy of such procedures. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective chart review of interventional pain management procedures. Setting: The procedures reviewed were conducted at the Cancer Pain Program and performed at the interventional suites of the McGill University Health Centre. Methods: The retrospective chart review included interventional pain management procedures performed between June 2015 and March 2017. Demographic data, details about the underlying cancer and about the procedure and peripTrocedural patients’ reported outcomes were recorded for analysis. Results: Eighty-two of 126 procedures were included for analysis. Most patients presented with metastatic disease (75%). Eighty percent of the patients reported pain relief, with the average pain severity decreasing by more than 2 points on a 0-to-10 Numeric Rating Scale for pain (from 6.5 of 10 to 4.2 of 10). Forty-three percent of patients were considered responders (≥ 50% pain relief). Responders also reported a significant decrease in fatigue, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and improved well-being. Among responders, average daily opioid use decreased significantly, by 60% on average. None of the analyzed variables correlated with the response; however, psychosocial variables like anxiety and depression showed a nonsignificant trend towards predicting procedure failure. Limitations: The core limitations of this study are its size and retrospective nature. Conclusions: In this cohort of cancer pain patients, interventional cancer pain procedures provided effective pain relief and other benefits, including pain relief, reduced burden of symptoms, and reduction of opioid intake, while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Patients with poorer ratings of depression and fatigue derived less benefit from procedures, suggesting that offering such procedures as part of patients’ treatment plan would be sensible, rather than leaving interventions for later stages. Key words: Cancer pain, pain management, pain intractable, treatment outcomes, palliative care, advanced cancer, cancer, evidence-based madicine


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Araujo ◽  
Dermot More-O'Ferrall ◽  
Steven H. Richeimer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document