Artificial Lift Selection Methodology for Vertical and Horizontal Wells in Conventional and Unconventional Reservoirs

Author(s):  
Tan Nguyen
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (01) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Trent Jacobs

Pumping proppant down a wellbore is the easy part. Ensuring that the precious material does its job is another matter. A trio of field studies recently presented at the 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (ATCE) highlight in different ways how emerging technology and old-fashioned problem solving are moving the industry needle on proppant and conductivity control. These examples include the adoption of unconventional completion techniques in a conventional oil field in Russia and work to validate the use of small amounts of ceramic proppant in North Dakota’s tight-oil formations. Both studies seek to counter widely held assumptions about proppant conductivity. A third study details a recently developed chemical coating that Permian Basin producers are applying “on the fly” to sand before it is pumped downhole. The new adhesive material has found a niche in helping operators mitigate the amount of sand that returns to surface during flowback, a sectorwide issue that drives up completion costs and later may spell trouble for artificial lift systems. Disproving “The Overflush Paradigm” After conventional reservoirs are hydraulically fractured, both from vertical and horizontal wells, it has been standard practice for decades to treat the newly propped perforations with a gentle touch. The approach to this end is known as underflushing. When underflushing, the goal is to leave behind just a few barrels’ worth of proppant-laden slurry over the perforations before attempting to complete further stages. The motivation for this boils down to the need for an insurance policy against displacing the near-wellbore proppant pack and causing the open fracture face to pinch off before it ever has a chance to transmit hydrocarbons. Such carefulness comes at a price. Underflushing raises the risk of needing a cleanout before oil can flow optimally to surface. This not only delays the arrival of first oil, it means extra equipment and personnel are required. However, a more glaring downside to underflushing is that it appears to be an unnecessary precaution. The near-wellbore fracture area is, in fact, more robust than what conventional wisdom allows credit for.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 070-082 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Ogunyomi ◽  
T. W. Patzek ◽  
L. W. Lake ◽  
C. S. Kabir

Summary Production data from most fractured horizontal wells in gas and liquid-rich unconventional reservoirs plot as straight lines with a one-half slope on a log-log plot of rate vs. time. This production signature (half-slope) is identical to that expected from a 1D linear flow from reservoir matrix to the fracture face, when production occurs at constant bottomhole pressure. In addition, microseismic data obtained around these fractured wells suggest that an area of enhanced permeability is developed around the horizontal well, and outside this region is an undisturbed part of the reservoir with low permeability. On the basis of these observations, geoscientists have, in general, adopted the conceptual double-porosity model in modeling production from fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs. The analytical solution to this mathematical model exists in Laplace space, but it cannot be inverted back to real-time space without use of a numerical inversion algorithm. We present a new approximate analytical solution to the double-porosity model in real-time space and its use in modeling and forecasting production from unconventional oil reservoirs. The first step in developing the approximate solution was to convert the systems of partial-differential equations (PDEs) for the double-porosity model into a system of ordinary-differential equations (ODEs). After which, we developed a function that gives the relationship between the average pressures in the high- and the low-permeability regions. With this relationship, the system of ODEs was solved and used to obtain a rate/time function that one can use to predict oil production from unconventional reservoirs. The approximate solution was validated with numerical reservoir simulation. We then performed a sensitivity analysis on the model parameters to understand how the model behaves. After the model was validated and tested, we applied it to field-production data by partially history matching and forecasting the expected ultimate recovery (EUR). The rate/time function fits production data and also yields realistic estimates of ultimate oil recovery. We also investigated the existence of any correlation between the model-derived parameters and available reservoir and well-completion parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document