Getting to Know You: “Relational Aesthetics”

Author(s):  
Atteqa Ali
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Hayes

This article concerns context-based live electronic music, specifically performances which occur in response to a particular location or space. I outline a set of practices which can be more accurately described as site-responsive, rather than site-specific. I develop a methodological framework for site-responsive live electronic music in three stages. First, I discuss the ambiguity of the termsite-specificby drawing on its origins within the visual arts and providing examples of how it has been used within sound art. I then suggest that site-responsive performance might be a more helpful way of describing this type of activity. I argue that it affords an opportunity for music to mediate the social, drawing on Small’s idea of music as sets of third-order relationships, and Bourriaud’s relational aesthetics. Third, I suggest that with the current renewed trend for performances occurring outside of cultural institutions, it is important to be mindful of the identity of a particular site, and those who have a cultural connection to it. I make reference to a series of works within my own creative practice which have explored these ideas.


Author(s):  
Shane Pike ◽  
Sasha Mackay ◽  
Michael Whelan ◽  
Bree Hadley ◽  
Kathryn Kelly

In Australia a vibrant tradition of participatory and often politically motivated performance work developed under the term ‘community arts and cultural development’ across the 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s. In this body of practice, considerations of ethics are articulated through process, practices and representation rather than content. Though effective, community arts as it developed in Australia is often time, resource and emotionally intensive for artists, community participants and audiences. In recent years, retraction of funding, as well as shifts in practice towards live art, performance art and relational aesthetics have reduced the resources available for these once prominent practices. Practitioners are confronting challenges and needing to develop new ways of working in an operating environment where long-term consultation is not necessarily possible or preferred by stakeholders. In this article, we reflect on the current state of play for practitioners seeking to develop ethical dramaturgy in performance works that collaborate with communities to tell life stories or represent participants’ lived experiences in Australia. Through examples from our own practice, as practice-led researchers, we consider how work in this sector is under strain and experiencing scarcity, precarity and an increasing lack of access to institutional resources that have historically enabled ethically rigorous dramaturgical practices. We aim, through this process, to rediscover and rearticulate an ethical dramaturgy for deployment in the Australian environment as it exists today.


Author(s):  
Stephanie Hill

In this paper I consider the representational and relational aesthetics of 'improvisational moments,' a term I am using to encompass both the moments of encounter between improvisers and audience members and the art that arises from these encounters. These moments cannot help but be evaluated—both relationally and representationally—by all stakeholders. From such an evaluation, a judgement of whether or not these improvisational moments have succeeded or failed almost certainly arises. An examination of failure in improvisation is of interest due to the likelihood that many (if not all) improvising artists have encountered improvisational moments which they have judged failures. Because there are two areas of expectation by which improvisational moments can be judged, those being in terms of representational and relational aesthetic standards, improvisational moments can be said to 'doubly fail.' This paper demonstrates that ultimately this 'double failure' can be 'doubly generative' of new creative products.


Leonardo ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-203
Author(s):  
Paul Ryan

This article traces the invention of the relational circuit, which makes possible an art of relationships called Threeing. This process of invention grew out of extensive video replay. Contrapposto made it possible to depict motion in stone. The relational circuit likewise makes possible a formal art of relationships for three people. This art form can be viewed in the light of relational aesthetics, a theory that judges artwork based on how it prompts inter-human activity and engagement with the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document