The paper explores whether legal and ethical concepts that have been used to protect the natural environment can also be leveraged to protect the ‘infosphere’, a neologism used by Luciano Floridi to characterize the totality of the informational environment. We focus, in particular, on the interaction between allocation of (intellectual) property rights and ‘communication duties’, in particular, data breach notification duties.
This article is part of the themed issue ‘The ethical impact of data science’.
Abstract
Big data is revolutionising the health care sector by making it easier to analyse large volumes of data. This enables health care providers to monitor individuals or systems in real time. However, the main concern with regard to big data in biomedicine is how to overcome the barriers to using such data for health-related research. The landscape of big data is still evolving and the law has not developed suitable principles for governing access to big data. This paper sketches the fuzzy contours of data ownership and related intellectual property rights to demonstrate that ownership is a concept that is ill-suited for governing rights in big data. The dawn of big data calls for an alternative normative framework. This framework must be capable of reconciling competing societal, individual and industries’ interests in the data with a view to ensuring fair access while minimising legal and ethical risks. Ultimately, the paper proposes a paradigm shift from ownership to custodianship in the governance of access and use of big data, particularly in international health-related research.
Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced
Research on Intellectual Property Rights of Electronic Commerce from the Perspective of Big Data
