A History of a Ruling Paradigm in the Earth and Planetary Sciences That Guided Research for Three Decades: The Giant Impact Model for the Origin of the Moon and the Earth-Moon System

2020 ◽  
pp. 137-199
Author(s):  
Robert Malcuit
Keyword(s):  
Impact Model ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

scholarly journals Isotopic evidence for the formation of the Moon in a canonical giant impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sune G. Nielsen ◽  
David V. Bekaert ◽  
Maureen Auro
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Main Stage ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
Bulk Silicate Earth ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Isotopic Measurements ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

AbstractIsotopic measurements of lunar and terrestrial rocks have revealed that, unlike any other body in the solar system, the Moon is indistinguishable from the Earth for nearly every isotopic system. This observation, however, contradicts predictions by the standard model for the origin of the Moon, the canonical giant impact. Here we show that the vanadium isotopic composition of the Moon is offset from that of the bulk silicate Earth by 0.18 ± 0.04 parts per thousand towards the chondritic value. This offset most likely results from isotope fractionation on proto-Earth during the main stage of terrestrial core formation (pre-giant impact), followed by a canonical giant impact where ~80% of the Moon originates from the impactor of chondritic composition. Our data refute the possibility of post-giant impact equilibration between the Earth and Moon, and implies that the impactor and proto-Earth mainly accreted from a common isotopic reservoir in the inner solar system.

scholarly journals Boundary conditions for the formation of the Moon

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Reuver ◽  
R.J. de Meijer ◽  
I.L. ten Kate ◽  
W. van Westrenen
Keyword(s):  
Angular Momentum ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Total Angular Momentum ◽  
Nuclear Explosion ◽  
Moment Of Inertia ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Impact

AbstractRecent measurements of the chemical and isotopic composition of lunar samples indicate that the Moon's bulk composition shows great similarities with the composition of the silicate Earth. Moon formation models that attempt to explain these similarities make a wide variety of assumptions about the properties of the Earth prior to the formation of the Moon (the proto-Earth), and about the necessity and properties of an impactor colliding with the proto-Earth. This paper investigates the effects of the proto-Earth's mass, oblateness and internal core-mantle differentiation on its moment of inertia. The ratio of angular momentum and moment of inertia determines the stability of the proto-Earth and the binding energy, i.e. the energy needed to make the transition from an initial state in which the system is a rotating single body with a certain angular momentum to a final state with two bodies (Earth and Moon) with the same total angular momentum, redistributed between Earth and Moon. For the initial state two scenarios are being investigated: a homogeneous (undifferentiated) proto-Earth and a proto-Earth differentiated in a central metallic and an outer silicate shell; for both scenarios a range of oblateness values is investigated. Calculations indicate that a differentiated proto-Earth would become unstable at an angular momentum L that exceeds the total angular momentum of the present-day Earth–Moon system (L0) by factors of 2.5–2.9, with the precise maximum dependent on the proto-Earth's oblateness. Further limitations are imposed by the Roche limit and the logical condition that the separated Earth–Moon system should be formed outside the proto-Earth. This further limits the L values of the Earth–Moon system to a maximum of about L/L0 = 1.5, at a minimum oblateness (a/c ratio) of 1.2. These calculations provide boundary conditions for the main classes of Moon-forming models. Our results show that at the high values of L used in recent giant impact models (1.8 < L/L0 < 3.1), the proposed proto-Earths are unstable before (Cuk & Stewart, 2012) or immediately after (Canup, 2012) the impact, even at a high oblateness (the most favourable condition for stability). We conclude that the recent attempts to improve the classic giant impact hypothesis by studying systems with very high values of L are not supported by the boundary condition calculations in this work. In contrast, this work indicates that the nuclear explosion model for Moon formation (De Meijer et al., 2013) fulfills the boundary conditions and requires approximately one order of magnitude less energy than originally estimated. Hence in our view the nuclear explosion model is presently the model that best explains the formation of the Moon from predominantly terrestrial silicate material.

scholarly journals Lunar exploration: opening a window into the history and evolution of the inner Solar System

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2024) ◽  
pp. 20130315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Crawford ◽  
Katherine H. Joy
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Lunar Exploration ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Origin And Evolution ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Geological Evolution ◽  
History Of ◽  
Rocky Planets

The lunar geological record contains a rich archive of the history of the inner Solar System, including information relevant to understanding the origin and evolution of the Earth–Moon system, the geological evolution of rocky planets, and our local cosmic environment. This paper provides a brief review of lunar exploration to-date and describes how future exploration initiatives will further advance our understanding of the origin and evolution of the Moon, the Earth–Moon system and of the Solar System more generally. It is concluded that further advances will require the placing of new scientific instruments on, and the return of additional samples from, the lunar surface. Some of these scientific objectives can be achieved robotically, for example by in situ geochemical and geophysical measurements and through carefully targeted sample return missions. However, in the longer term, we argue that lunar science would greatly benefit from renewed human operations on the surface of the Moon, such as would be facilitated by implementing the recently proposed Global Exploration Roadmap.

scholarly journals Siderophile element constraints on the origin of the Moon

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2024) ◽  
pp. 20130258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Walker
Keyword(s):  
The Moon ◽  
Element Abundances ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Precision Determination ◽  
Mantle Sources ◽  
Volcanic Glasses ◽  
High Precision Determination ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

Discovery of small enrichments in 182 W/ 184 W in some Archaean rocks, relative to modern mantle, suggests both exogeneous and endogenous modifications to highly siderophile element (HSE) and moderately siderophile element abundances in the terrestrial mantle. Collectively, these isotopic enrichments suggest the formation of chemically fractionated reservoirs in the terrestrial mantle that survived the putative Moon-forming giant impact, and also provide support for the late accretion hypothesis. The lunar mantle sources of volcanic glasses and basalts were depleted in HSEs relative to the terrestrial mantle by at least a factor of 20. The most likely explanations for the disparity between the Earth and Moon are either that the Moon received a disproportionately lower share of late accreted materials than the Earth, such as may have resulted from stochastic late accretion, or the major phase of late accretion occurred prior to the Moon-forming event, and the putative giant impact led to little drawdown of HSEs to the Earth's core. High precision determination of the 182 W isotopic composition of the Moon can help to resolve this issue.

Nickel for Your Thoughts: Urey and the Origin of the Moon

Science ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 217 (4563) ◽  
pp. 891-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Brush
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Lunar Crust ◽  
Lunar Landing ◽  
The Earth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Siderophile Elements ◽  
Origin Of The Moon ◽  
Manned Lunar Landing

The theories of Harold C. Urey (1893-1981) on the origin of the moon are discussed in relation to earlier ideas, especially George Howard Darwin's fission hypothesis. Urey's espousal of the idea that the moon had been captured by the earth and has preserved information about the earliest history of the solar system led him to advocate a manned lunar landing. Results from the Apollo missions, in particular the deficiency of siderophile elements in the lunar crust, led him to abandon the capture selenogony and tentatively adopt the fission hypothesis.

scholarly journals Isotopes as tracers of the sources of the lunar material and processes of lunar origin

2014 ◽  
Vol 372 (2024) ◽  
pp. 20130257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaveh Pahlevan
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Calculations ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Isotopic Tracers ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
Lunar Material ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Post Impact ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mass Dependent

Ever since the Apollo programme, isotopic abundances have been used as tracers to study lunar formation, in particular to study the sources of the lunar material. In the past decade, increasingly precise isotopic data have been reported that give strong indications that the Moon and the Earth's mantle have a common heritage. To reconcile these observations with the origin of the Moon via the collision of two distinct planetary bodies, it has been proposed (i) that the Earth–Moon system underwent convective mixing into a single isotopic reservoir during the approximately 10 3 year molten disc epoch after the giant impact but before lunar accretion, or (ii) that a high angular momentum impact injected a silicate disc into orbit sourced directly from the mantle of the proto-Earth and the impacting planet in the right proportions to match the isotopic observations. Recently, it has also become recognized that liquid–vapour fractionation in the energetic aftermath of the giant impact is capable of generating measurable mass-dependent isotopic offsets between the silicate Earth and Moon, rendering isotopic measurements sensitive not only to the sources of the lunar material, but also to the processes accompanying lunar origin. Here, we review the isotopic evidence that the silicate–Earth–Moon system represents a single planetary reservoir. We then discuss the development of new isotopic tracers sensitive to processes in the melt–vapour lunar disc and how theoretical calculations of their behaviour and sample observations can constrain scenarios of post-impact evolution in the earliest history of the Earth–Moon system.

The importance of tidal friction for the early history of the Moon

1967 ◽  
Vol 296 (1446) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Body Problem ◽  
Early History ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Tidal Friction ◽  
Moon System ◽  
Two Body Problem ◽  
Dissipation Of Energy ◽  
The Earth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Rotation Of The Earth

About ten years ago I began to investigate tidal friction and its influence on the evolution of the Earth-Moon system, and I first describe the model used. Following the ideas of G. H. Darwin, I treated the system as a two-body problem. The Moon raises tides on the Earth and the two bulges of the tidal ellipsoid, because of the rotation of the Earth, revolve twice daily. The line joining them forms an angle ψ with the line joining their centres; this is a measure of the dissipation of energy. The Moon, considered as a point mass, exerts a retarding couple on the deviated tidal ellipsoid. Contrary to Darwin, I have limited myself to the case of small angles ψ , but I have allowed for arbitrary changes of the other parameters of the orbit, for example, changes of the obliquity ∊ between the earth’s axis and the pole of the orbit as well as changes of the eccentricity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document