2001 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 2501-2501
Author(s):  
C.‐Y. Peter Chiu ◽  
Bethany Strange ◽  
James Brockman

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Cosentino ◽  
Tiago H. Falk ◽  
David McAlpine ◽  
Torsten Marquardt

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document