scholarly journals Correction to: Rotator Cuff

Author(s):  
Eva Llopis ◽  
Alexeys Perez ◽  
Luis Cerezal
Keyword(s):  

10.1007/978-3-030-71281-5

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Littlewood ◽  
Julia Wade ◽  
Stephanie Butler-Walley ◽  
Martyn Lewis ◽  
David Beard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinically, a distinction is made between types of rotator cuff tear, traumatic and non-traumatic, and this sub-classification currently informs the treatment pathway. It is currently recommended that patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears are fast tracked for surgical opinion. However, there is uncertainty about the most clinically and cost-effective intervention for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears and further research is required. SPeEDy will assess the feasibility of a fully powered, multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the hypothesis that, compared to surgical repair (and usual post-operative rehabilitation), a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise is not clinically inferior, but is more cost-effective for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears. Methods SPeEDy is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility RCT with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and further qualitative investigation of patient experience. A total of 76 patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears will be recruited from approximately eight UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either surgical repair and usual post-operative rehabilitation or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise. The QRI is a mixed-methods approach that includes data collection and analysis of screening logs, audio recordings of recruitment consultations, interviews with patients and clinicians involved in recruitment, and review of study documentation as a basis for developing action plans to address identified difficulties whilst recruitment to the RCT is underway. A further sample of patient participants will be purposively sampled from both intervention groups and interviewed to explore reasons for initial participation, treatment acceptability, reasons for non-completion of treatment, where relevant, and any reasons for treatment crossover. Discussion Research to date suggests that there is uncertainty regarding the most clinically and cost-effective interventions for patients with traumatic rotator cuff tears. There is a clear need for a high-quality, fully powered, RCT to better inform clinical practice. Prior to this, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility RCT to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and number of and reasons for treatment crossover. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04027205) – Registered on 19 July 2019. Available via


2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-219099
Author(s):  
Sanna Cederqvist ◽  
Tapio Flinkkilä ◽  
Markus Sormaala ◽  
Jari Ylinen ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
...  

BackgroundRotator cuff disease (RCD) causes prolonged shoulder pain and disability in adults. RCD is a continuum ranging from tendinopathy to full-thickness tendon tear. Recent studies have shown that subacromial decompression and non-surgical treatments provide equivalent results in RCD without a full-thickness tendon lesion. However, the importance of surgery for full-thickness tendon tears remains unclear.MethodsIn a pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial, 417 patients with subacromial pain underwent 3-month initial rehabilitation and MRI arthrography (MRA) for the diagnosis of RCD. Of these, 190 shoulders remained symptomatic and were randomised to non-surgical or surgical treatments. The primary outcomes were the mean changes in the Visual Analogue Scale for pain and the Constant Murley Score for shoulder function at the 2-year follow-up.ResultsAt the 2-year follow-up, both non-surgical and surgical treatments for RCD reduced pain and improved shoulder function. The scores differed between groups by 4 (95% CI −3 to 10, p=0.25) for pain and 3.4 (95% CI −0.4 to 7.1, p=0.077) for function. Among patients with full-thickness ruptures, the reduction in pain (13, 95% CI 5 to 22, p=0.002) and improvement in function (7.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 12.2, p=0.008) favoured surgery.ConclusionsNon-surgical and surgical treatments for RCD provided equivalent improvements in pain and function. Therefore, we recommend non-surgical treatment as the primary choice for patients with RCD. However, surgery yielded superior improvement in pain and function for full-thickness rotator cuff rupture. Therefore, rotator cuff repair may be suggested after failed non-surgical treatment.Trial registration detailsClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00695981 and NCT00637013.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Abstract Download the CE Questions PDF from the toolbar, above. Use the questions to guide your Perspectives reading. When you're ready, purchase the activity from the ASHA Store and follow the instructions to take the exam in ASHA's Learning Center. Available until August 13, 2018.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Taylor ◽  
Emily White ◽  
Rachael Kaplan ◽  
Colleen M. O'Rourke
Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 11 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 14 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


Author(s):  
Celeste Domsch
Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 17 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Binger ◽  
Jennifer Kent-Walsh
Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 12 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 7 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Hickey ◽  
Monica McKenna ◽  
Celeste Woods ◽  
Carmen Archibald
Keyword(s):  

Sorry, this activity is no longer available for CEUs. Visit the SIG 12 page on the ASHA Store to see available CE activities. Use the CE questions PDF here as study questions to guide your Perspectives reading.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Download the CE Questions PDF from the toolbar, above. Use the questions to guide your Perspectives reading. When you're ready, purchase the activity from the ASHA Store and follow the instructions to take the exam in ASHA's Learning Center. Available until July 30, 2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document