Seldinger Technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Matthew Czar Taon
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Benito A. Abraham ◽  
Aldrin Joseph R. Gamboa ◽  
David S. Finley ◽  
Shawn M. Beck ◽  
Hak J. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
N S Nahman ◽  
D F Middendorf ◽  
W H Bay ◽  
R McElligott ◽  
S Powell ◽  
...  

The placement of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheters under direct peritoneoscopic visualization is a relatively new technique for establishing peritoneal dialysis access. In this study, in which a modification of the Seldinger technique was used to facilitate the placement of the peritoneoscope, the experience with 82 consecutive catheterization procedures in 78 patients is reported. In 2 (2.4%) of 82 catheterization procedures, we were unable to enter the peritoneal cavity but experienced no other complications unique to the percutaneous approach. Of the 80 successful catheterization procedures, 76 represented first-time catheter placement and constituted a population subjected to life-table analysis examining catheter survival rates, the time to first cutaneous exit site or s.c. tunnel infection, and the time to first episode of peritonitis. After a follow-up period of 50.1 patient yr, 11 catheters were lost because of catheter dysfunction. Other clinical complications included peritoneal fluid leaks at the cutaneous exit site in 11 instances (0.22/patient yr), cutaneous exit site infection in 7 instances (0.14/patient yr), s.c. tunnel infection in 2 instances (0.04/patient yr), and 34 episodes of peritonitis (0.68/patient yr). The results of this study demonstrate that the suggested modification of the percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, under peritoneoscopic visualization, is a viable method for establishing peritoneal access.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. e2017.00091
Author(s):  
Maitham A. Moslim ◽  
Gavin A. Falk ◽  
Federico G. Seifarth

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith S Boniface ◽  
Maxine A LeSaux ◽  
Sohaib Mandoorah ◽  
Amit Patel ◽  
Kai L Neander ◽  
...  

Purpose: We evaluated the performance of an encapsulated guidewire designed for single-handed use with ultrasound-guided vascular access (SonoStik) with Seldinger technique, as compared with conventional intravenous catheters placed under ultrasound guidance in healthy subjects. Methods: This is a prospective cohort trial in healthy subjects in which each subject served as his/her own control by having a SonoStik ultrasound intravenous cannulation placed in one arm and a conventionally placed, standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation placed in the other arm. The basilic vein was used because it is a non-visible and non-palpable vein. Emergency department technicians with extensive experience in ultrasound-guided intravenous access performed the procedures. The first-attempt success rate of intravenous-guided intravenous by using the SonoStik was compared to the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation in adult healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes including time of procedure, technicians’ and subjects’ satisfaction, and complications were compared in both arms of the study. Results: A total of 24 volunteers with a mean age of 22.7 years were enrolled. Four emergency department technicians with extensive prior experience with ultrasound-guided intravenous access but with no prior experience using the SonoStik device performed the procedures. The first-attempt success was 83.3% with the use of SonoStik ultrasound intravenous cannulation compared to 95.8% with the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation. There was a mean of 1.14 insertions per each successful placement in the SonoStik group compared to 1.04 insertions by using the standard catheters (mean differences = –0.1; 95% confidence interval = –0.6 to 0.4). There were no complications in either SonoStik or the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation group. The mean time of insertion using SonoStik was slightly longer compared to standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation (143.3 vs 109.7 s). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that emergency department technicians skilled in ultrasound-guided intravenous access could successfully place SonoStik 83.3% of the time in vessels that were unable to be palpated or visualized. Compared to standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation, the odds ratio of successful cannulation with SonoStik was 0.91 (95% confidence interval = 0.04–17.5). In all cases, the time required to successfully insert SonoStik was less than 4 min from tourniquet application to catheter advancement to hub, with a mean time of less than 2.5 min.


2006 ◽  
Vol 135 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P261-P261
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Veenker ◽  
Patrick J Antonelli ◽  
Jason Ramirez ◽  
Harshdeep Wilkhu
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
E vanSonnenberg ◽  
PR Mueller ◽  
JT Ferrucci ◽  
CC Neff ◽  
JF Simeone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document