scholarly journals Understanding Decision Quality through Satisfaction

2014 ◽  
pp. 368-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Carneiro ◽  
Ricardo Santos ◽  
Goreti Marreiros ◽  
Paulo Novais
Keyword(s):  
Decision Quality

scholarly journals Group decision quality, conscientiousness and competition

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1872907
Author(s):  
Lukman Nul Hakim ◽  
Guritnaningsih A. Santoso ◽  
Bagus Takwin ◽  
Yos Sunitiyoso ◽  
Juneman Abraham
Keyword(s):  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Quality

scholarly journals Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3559
Author(s):  
Charleen I. Theroux ◽  
Kylie N. Hill ◽  
Anna L. Olsavsky ◽  
James L. Klosky ◽  
Nicholas D. Yeager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Fertility Preservation ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survivors ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Decision Quality ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Male Adolescents ◽  
Decisional Satisfaction ◽  
Ongoing Support

Half of male childhood cancer survivors experience treatment-related fertility impairment, which can lead to distress. Survivors often regret forgoing fertility preservation (FP), and decisional dissatisfaction is associated with a lower quality of life. This mixed methods study examined short-term FP decisional satisfaction among families of male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer who received an initial fertility consult and completed an FP values clarification tool. One-two months after the FP decision, thirty-nine families completed the Brief Subjective Decision Quality measure. Decisional satisfaction was compared for participants (mothers, fathers, adolescents) who did and did not attempt to bank. Semi-structured interviews included the following question: How do you/your family feel about the banking decision now/in the future? Decisional quality scores were moderate-high (M = 5.74–6.33 out of 7), with no significant differences between non-attempter (n = 15) and attempter (n = 24) families (adolescents: p = 0.83, d = 0.08; mothers: p = 0.18, d = 0.45; fathers: p = 0.32, d = 0.44). Three qualitative themes emerged among non-attempter families: (1) satisfaction with decision (50% of participants), (2) acceptance of decision (60%), and (3) potential for future regret (40%). Satisfaction with decision was the only theme identified in attempter families (93%). Quantitively, short-term decisional satisfaction was high regardless of the banking attempt. However, the qualitative findings suggest that the experiences of families who did not bank may be more nuanced, as several participants discussed a potential for future regret, highlighting the importance of ongoing support.

scholarly journals Heart and Mind: Essential Components in Sound Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 364-364
Author(s):  
Michaela Clark ◽  
Julie Hicks Patrick ◽  
Michaela Reardon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Quality ◽  
Cluster Solution ◽  
Cognitive Resources ◽  
Cluster Membership ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Affective Components ◽  
Heart And Mind

Abstract Consumer tasks permit an ecologically-valid context in which to examine the contributions of affective and cognitive resources to decision-making processes and outcomes. Although previous work shows that cognitive factors are important when individuals make decisions (Patrick et al., 2013; Queen et al.), the role of affective components is less clear. We examine these issues in two studies. Study 1 used data from 1000+ adults to inform a cluster analysis examining affective aspects (importance, meaningfulness) of making different types of decisions. A 4-cluster solution resulted. In Study 2, we used affective cluster membership and cognitive performance as predictors of experimental decision-making outcomes among a subset of participants (N = 60). Results of the regression (F(2, 40) = 6.51, p < .01, R2 = .25.) revealed that both the affective clusters (b = .37, p = .01) and cognitive ability (b = -.30, p = .04) uniquely contributed to the variance explained in decision quality. Age did not uniquely contribute. Results are discussed in the context of developing measures that enable us to move the field forward.

Mutual fund performance: The decision quality and capital magnet efficiencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Pierre Hsieh ◽  
Imen Tebourbi ◽  
Wen‐Min Lu ◽  
Nai‐Yu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Fund ◽  
Fund Performance ◽  
Decision Quality ◽  
Mutual Fund Performance

The Positive Effects of Easy Goals on Decision Quality and Risk Propensity in an MCPLP Task

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 880-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis A. Taylor ◽  
Richard A. Cosier ◽  
Daniel C. Ganster
Keyword(s):  
Decision Quality ◽  
Risk Propensity ◽  
Positive Effects

Using Decision Quality Principles To Balance Your R&D Portfolio

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Matheson ◽  
Michael M. Menke
Keyword(s):  
Decision Quality ◽  
Quality Principles

Psychometric Evaluation of a Decision Quality Instrument for Treatment of Lumbar Herniated Disc

Spine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (18) ◽  
pp. 1609-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen R. Sepucha ◽  
Sandra Feibelmann ◽  
William A. Abdu ◽  
Catharine F. Clay ◽  
Carol Cosenza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Decision Quality ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Quality Instrument
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document