Modeling the Potential for Critical Habitat

Author(s):  
Richard L. Church ◽  
Matthew R. Niblett ◽  
Ross A. Gerrard
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 105479
Author(s):  
Lauren H. McWhinnie ◽  
Patrick D. O'Hara ◽  
Casey Hilliard ◽  
Nicole Le Baron ◽  
Leh Smallshaw ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0193102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin M. Brauneder ◽  
Chloe Montes ◽  
Simon Blyth ◽  
Leon Bennun ◽  
Stuart H. M. Butchart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 1508-1510
Author(s):  
Blanca Sierra De Ledo
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 1248-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinhai Li ◽  
Matthew K Litvak ◽  
John E. Hughes Clarke

The overwintering habitat use of shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) was investigated from January to March 2005 in the upper Kennebecasis River, New Brunswick, Canada, using a novel underwater video camera system and modeling approach. Following a random sampling procedure, 187 holes were drilled into the ice, and 234 sturgeon were counted and video-recorded. We found that sturgeon concentrated in a 2 ha area at the confluence of the Kennebecasis and Hammond rivers on a flat sandy substrate at a depth of 3.1–6.9 m. Generalized linear models were developed to describe the relationship of shortnose sturgeon density and habitat variables. The model indicated that the shortnose sturgeon had significant preference to deeper areas within this region. The total abundance of shortnose sturgeon in the area was estimated to be 4836 ± 69 (mean ± standard error) using the ordinary kriging method to interpolate sturgeon density at unsampled sites. This overwintering habitat of shortnose sturgeon can be defined as critical habitat following the identification policies of the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA).


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara G. Martin ◽  
Abbey E. Camaclang ◽  
Hugh P. Possingham ◽  
Lynn A. Maguire ◽  
Iadine Chadès
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2174-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelia S.M. Vanderlaan ◽  
R. Kent Smedbol ◽  
Christopher T. Taggart

Commercial fishing gear can potentially entangle any whale, and this is especially true for the endangered North Atlantic right whale ( Eubalaena glacialis ), for which entanglement is second only to vessel strike as being responsible for documented right whale deaths. We use right whale survey data and Canadian fishing-gear deployment data to estimate the relative threat of gear entanglement in a Scotia–Fundy study area and the relative risk of lethal entanglement in the Bay of Fundy and on Roseway Basin, Scotian Shelf, where Critical Habitat has been legislated. We focus on groundfish and pelagic hook-and-line; groundfish gillnet; and crab-, hagfish-, and inshore and offshore lobster-trap gear. Our analyses demonstrate that groundfish hook-and-line gear poses the greatest threat to right whales among the seven gear types analysed during the summer-resident period in Critical Habitat and that gear from the lobster fisheries poses the greatest threat during the spring and autumn periods when whales are migrating to and from Critical Habitat. We suggest that area-specific seasonal closures of some fisheries would reduce threat and risk to whales without unduly compromising fishing interests.


Sea Ice ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 395-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia T. Tynan ◽  
David G. Ainley ◽  
Ian Stirling

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document