Identifying Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease: When (Not) to Start Screening for Varices and Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

2016 ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Augustin ◽  
Mónica Pons ◽  
Begoña Santos ◽  
Meritxell Ventura ◽  
Joan Genescà
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (05) ◽  
pp. 526-533
Author(s):  
Horia Stefanescu ◽  
Corina Rusu ◽  
Monica Lupsor-Platon ◽  
Oana Nicoara Farcau ◽  
Petra Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting. Materials and Methods Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other. Results 2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR < 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p < 0.0001), especially if HVPG < 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039). Conclusion 2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH.


Gut ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Jansen ◽  
Christopher Bogs ◽  
Aleksander Krag ◽  
Sven Francque ◽  
Jonel Trebicka

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-902
Author(s):  
Andrea Lisotti ◽  
Francesco Azzaroli ◽  
Laura Turco ◽  
Federica Buonfiglioli ◽  
Paolo Cecinato ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. S734
Author(s):  
S. Rodrigues ◽  
A. Berzigotti ◽  
M. Montani ◽  
A. De Gottardi ◽  
J. Bosch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document