2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margien E. den Hollander-Gijsman ◽  
Klaas J. Wardenaar ◽  
Edwin de Beurs ◽  
Nic J. A. van der Wee ◽  
Ab Mooijaart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1920 ◽  
Vol 66 (274) ◽  
pp. 274-282
Author(s):  
D. K. Henderson

A widower, set. 69, was admitted recently to the Glasgow Royal Mental Hospital in an anxious, apprehensive, excited, restless state. The history of the case showed that he had come of a good stock, and that he had been a strong, healthy man. For a period of forty-six years he had been employed by the same firm of lawyers, and latterly had been their cashier. He had married twice; there were four children from the first marriage and two from the second. He had divorced his second wife on account of her unfaithfulness. In January, 1919, he resigned his position, sold his home, and made plans to live with his daughter. Three days after his home and furniture had been sold he made a determined attempt on his life by cutting his throat. One month later he was admitted to the Glasgow Royal Mental Hospital. Following his admission he continued in a state of abject misery, he moaned and groaned, wrung his hands, resented any interference, and was very restless. He realised that he was in a hospital, but his mind was so occupied by his depressive thoughts and he was so miserable that he would not assist in a satisfactory mental examination. Physically he was in poor general health, his pulse was irregular and intermittent, and he had peripheral arterio-sclerosis. During the next few months he gradually improved in strength and general condition but mentally panics of anxious apprehension supervened from time to time, in which he became self-accusatory, and expressed hopeless feeling as regard his prospect of recovery. At the same time he was perfectly oriented, and his memory, general knowledge, and personality were all well retained. No particular attempt was ever made at psycho-analysis (his age seemed to preclude such a procedure), but nevertheless casual conversations* were sufficient to allow him to give expression to his fears, and incidentally to show where his conflicts and difficulties lay. He complained of the other patients, said that they looked as if they could tear his bones out, that they wished to do him an injury, that they slandered him, that they accused him of incest with his daughter. At this point he began to defend himself with great warmth and emphasis, and said, quite unnecessarily, that the only thing that supported him was the consciousness of his own rectitude, that nothing had been further from his thoughts, etc. These matters were never argued out with him, but he was encouraged always to say what he had to say, and eventually six months after admission he was discharged as recovered.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1084-1098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Castagna ◽  
Scott Roye ◽  
Matthew Calamia ◽  
Joshua Owens-French ◽  
Thompson E. Davis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1795-1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. C. Russell ◽  
S. G. Luke ◽  
R. A. Lundwall ◽  
M. South

Author(s):  
Rebekah Sheldon

The Child to Come reads American culture from the 1960s to the present as a period in which the anxious apprehension of nonhuman vitality has sought alleviation in the figure of the child. Yet the salvific life of the child only assuages to the degree that it also gives expression to the forces of nonhuman vitality it was fitted to capture. Drawing on arguments in the field of childhood studies about the interweaving of the child with the life sciences, the book argues that neither life nor the child are what they used to be. Under pressure from ecological change, artificial reproductive technology, genetic engineering, and the neoliberalization of the economy, the child no longer serves a biopolitical technology trained on sexual subjectivity. Instead, the contemporary, queerly-human child signals the ascendancy of a new episteme: the biopolitics of reproduction. Thus, subjectivity is far less crucial than the direct intervention into life itself within the paradigmatic locus of the pregnant woman and the sacred child.


2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennady G. Knyazev ◽  
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter ◽  
Jack van Honk

1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack B. Nitschke ◽  
Wendy Heller ◽  
Patrick A. Palmieri ◽  
Gregory A. Miller

Author(s):  
Stella Bitran ◽  
David H. Barlow ◽  
David A. Spiegel

Anxious apprehension and overconcern are common to many anxiety and mood disorders. Prior to 1980 in the American DSM diagnostic system, and 1992 in the international ICD system, individuals who experienced those symptoms in the absence of a realistic focus of concern were classified as having an ‘anxiety neurosis’ (DSM-II) or ‘anxiety state’ (ICD-9). In DSM-III, panic disorder was split off from that classification, and the residual category was renamed generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). A similar nomenclature was adopted in ICD-10. Since its inception, GAD as a nosological entity has been troubled by problems of poor reliability and high comorbidity. Those concerns have prompted several revisions of the DSM criteria and also have raised more basic questions regarding the validity of GAD as a disorder distinct from other anxiety and mood states. The question of what is the nature of GAD is still being debated and it remains one of the least reliably diagnosed anxiety or mood disorders. This diagnostic unreliability has led to various suggestions for revisions to the diagnostic criteria and criticisms of the current definition of GAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document