Two Models for Hydraulic Cylinders in Flexible Multibody Simulations

Author(s):  
Antti Ylinen ◽  
Jari Mäkinen ◽  
Reijo Kouhia
2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Augusta Neto ◽  
Jorge A. C. Ambrósio ◽  
Luis M. Roseiro ◽  
A. Amaro ◽  
C. M. A. Vasques

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 168781402110348
Author(s):  
Kai Hu ◽  
Wenyi Zhang

In order to improve the steering flexibility of agricultural machinery in hilly and mountainous areas, a multi-mode steering system with front wheel steering, rear wheel steering, and four-wheel steering has been developed. The hydraulic steering system based on load sensitivity principle and proportion-integration-differentiation (PID) controlling algorithm was designed, which overcomes the negative impact of external load changes on flow control accuracy. The mechanical-hydraulic-controlling coupling model established in the AMESim and the sequential quadratic combinatorial optimization algorithm (SQCOA) was adopted to obtain the optimal combination of PID parameters. The simulation results demonstrate that the parameters such as pressure, speed, displacement of hydraulic cylinders, etc. in different steering modes meet the design requirements. To examine and verify the system performance, the test platform was researched and developed for conducting steering radius and displacement measurement. The experimental data illustrated that the front and rear hydraulic cylinders have good synchronization accuracy in four-wheel steering mode, and the fast switch of steering mode can be realized. The maximum error rate of is steering radius 4.21% and 3.77%, respectively, in two-wheel steering and four-wheel steering modes. The research methods and conclusions can provide a theoretical basis and reference for the other steering system development.


1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Campanelli ◽  
Marcello Berzeri ◽  
Ahmed A. Shabana

Many flexible multibody applications are characterized by high inertia forces and motion discontinuities. Because of these characteristics, problems can be encountered when large displacement finite element formulations are used in the simulation of flexible multibody systems. In this investigation, the performance of two different large displacement finite element formulations in the analysis of flexible multibody systems is investigated. These are the incremental corotational procedure proposed in an earlier article (Rankin, C. C., and Brogan, F. A., 1986, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 108, pp. 165–174) and the non-incremental absolute nodal coordinate formulation recently proposed (Shabana, A. A., 1998, Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). It is demonstrated in this investigation that the limitation resulting from the use of the infinitesmal nodal rotations in the incremental corotational procedure can lead to simulation problems even when simple flexible multibody applications are considered. The absolute nodal coordinate formulation, on the other hand, does not employ infinitesimal or finite rotation coordinates and leads to a constant mass matrix. Despite the fact that the absolute nodal coordinate formulation leads to a non-linear expression for the elastic forces, the results presented in this study, surprisingly, demonstrate that such a formulation is efficient in static problems as compared to the incremental corotational procedure. The excellent performance of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation in static and dynamic problems can be attributed to the fact that such a formulation does not employ rotations and leads to exact representation of the rigid body motion of the finite element. [S1050-0472(00)00604-8]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document