Selected Temporal Logic Systems: An Attempt at Engineering Evaluation

Author(s):  
Krystian Jobczyk ◽  
Antoni Ligeza ◽  
Krzysztof Kluza
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Finger ◽  
Dov Gabbay
Keyword(s):  

Problemos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 132-149
Author(s):  
Živilė Pabijutaitė

Over the past several decades, in the field of temporal logic there have been created a great number of semantical theories that provide different truth conditions for tensed propositions. In this article we deal with five non-bivalent semantical interpretations of the temporal logic systems CL (Cocchiarella Linear) and Kb (Kripke Branching): 1) Ł3 by J. Łukasiewicz; 2) K3 by S. C. Kleene; 3) Ockhamism by A. Prior; 4) supervaluationism by R. Thomason; 5) relativism by J. MacFarlane. The aim of this article is to present a detailed typology of the five semantical theories based on these criteria: a) the ability to deal with the problem of retrospective evaluation of future contingent propositions; b) the ability to deal with the problem of divine omniscience and free will; c) their relation to the law of excluded middle; d) their relation to other formulas that are intuitively acceptable in an intederministic context. It is argued that the only theory that satisfies all four criteria is the relativism of J. MacFarlane; however, it faces some serious challenges when dealing with the problem of retrospective evaluation of future contingent propositions in the theological context.


Axioms ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz Surowik

The article discusses minimal temporal logic systems built on the basis of classical logic as well as intuitionistic logic. The constructions of these systems are discussed as well as their basic properties. The K t system was discussed as the minimal temporal logic system built based on classical logic, while the IK t system and its modification were discussed as the minimal temporal logic system built based on intuitionistic logic.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 2874-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-wei LAI ◽  
Shan-li HU ◽  
Zheng-yuan NING ◽  
Xiu-li WANG
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Michael Germana

Chapter 2 examines Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man as a text that ekphrastically simulates a moving or “peristrephic” panorama in general, and an antebellum antislavery panorama in particular. In the process, this chapter reads Ellison’s debut novel as a text indebted to and allusive of, while ironically commenting on, the life and career of celebrated fugitive and peristrephic panoramist Henry Box Brown, who shipped himself in a sealed wooden crate from Richmond to Philadelphia and thus from slavery to freedom in 1849. Brown’s subsequent efforts to navigate the terrain of abolitionist discourse within a white supremacist culture led him to create a moving panorama called the Mirror of Slavery, which chronicled the cruelties of slavery, yet ended with the promise of universal emancipation. In appropriating the visual grammar of the antislavery panorama, Ellison also extends its ambivalent temporal logic to create his own alternative history in service of the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document