Visualizing Dynamic Ambient/Focal Attention with Coefficient $$K$$

Author(s):  
A. T. Duchowski ◽  
K. Krejtz
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Liu ◽  
Zhendong Mao ◽  
Tianzhu Zhang ◽  
Anan Liu ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Suffczynski ◽  
Stiliyan Kalitzin ◽  
Gert Pfurtscheller ◽  
F.H Lopes da Silva

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. O'Leary ◽  
Robert I. Block ◽  
Julie A. Koeppel ◽  
Susan K. Schultz ◽  
Vincent A. Magnotta ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 574-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Max Hopf ◽  
Toemme Noesselt ◽  
Claus Tempelmann ◽  
Jochen Braun ◽  
Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-133
Author(s):  
Sergio Morra

I compare the concepts of “activation” and “storage” as foundations of short-term memory, and suggest that an attention-based view of STM does not need to posit specialized short-term stores. In particular, no compelling evidence supports the hypothesis of time-limited stores. Identifying sources of activation, examining the role of activated procedural knowledge, and studying working memory development are central issues in modelling capacity-limited focal attention.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
H. Egeth ◽  
J. Moher
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Ogawa ◽  
Yuji Takeda ◽  
Akihiro Yagi

Inhibitory tagging is a process that prevents focal attention from revisiting previously checked items in inefficient searches, facilitating search performance. Recent studies suggested that inhibitory tagging is object rather than location based, but it was unclear whether inhibitory tagging operates on moving objects. The present study investigated the tagging effect on moving objects. Participants were asked to search for a moving target among randomly and independently moving distractors. After either efficient or inefficient search, participants performed a probe detection task that measured the inhibitory effect on search items. The inhibitory effect on distractors was observed only after inefficient searches. The present results support the concept of object-based inhibitory tagging.


1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-384
Author(s):  
Cyril Latimer

Pylyshyn makes a convincing case that early visual processing is cognitively impenetrable, and although I question the utility of binary oppositions such as penetrable/impenetrable, for the most part I am in agreement. The author does not provide explicit designations or denotations for the terms penetrable and impenetrable, which appear quite arbitrary. Furthermore, the use of focal attention smacks of an homunculus, and the account appears to slip too easily between the perceptual, the cognitive, and the neurophysiological.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document