Visibility of Nodes in Network Growth Models

Author(s):  
Siddharth Pal ◽  
Soham De ◽  
Tanmoy Chakraborty ◽  
Ralucca Gera
Author(s):  
Shravika Mittal ◽  
Tanmoy Chakraborty ◽  
Siddharth Pal

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 52-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleks Jacob Gurfinkel ◽  
Daniel A. Silva ◽  
Per Arne Rikvold

Complexity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Beckage ◽  
Eliana Colunga

Network models of language provide a systematic way of linking cognitive processes to the structure and connectivity of language. Using network growth models to capture learning, we focus on the study of the emergence of complexity in early language learners. Specifically, we capture the emergent structure of young toddler’s vocabularies through network growth models assuming underlying knowledge representations of semantic and phonological networks. In construction and analyses of these network growth models, we explore whether phonological or semantic relationships between words play a larger role in predicting network growth as these young learners add new words to their lexicon. We also examine how the importance of these semantic and phonological representations changes during the course of development. We propose a novel and significant theoretical framework for network growth models of acquisition and test the ability of these models to predict what words a specific child is likely to learn approximately one month in the future. We find that which acquisition model best fits is influenced by the underlying network representation, the assumed process of growth, and the network centrality measure used to relate the cognitive underpinnings of acquisition to network growth. The joint importance of representation, process, and the contribution of individual words to the predictive accuracy of the network model highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of early acquisition, provides new tools, and suggests experimental hypotheses for studying lexical acquisition.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bell ◽  
Supun Perera ◽  
Mahendrarajah Piraveenan ◽  
Michiel Bliemer ◽  
Tanya Latty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 24001
Author(s):  
V. Palchykov ◽  
M. Krasnytska ◽  
O. Mryglod ◽  
Yu. Holovatch

We suggest an underlying mechanism that governs the growth of a network of concepts, a complex network that reflects the connections between different scientific concepts based on their co-occurrences in publications. To this end, we perform empirical analysis of a network of concepts based on the preprints in physics submitted to the arXiv.org. We calculate the network characteristics and show that they cannot follow as a result of several simple commonly used network growth models. In turn, we suggest that a simultaneous account of two factors, i.e., growth by blocks and preferential selection, gives an explanation of empirically observed properties of the concepts network. Moreover, the observed structure emerges as a synergistic effect of these both factors: each of them alone does not lead to a satisfactory picture.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia S. Q. Siew

A fundamental goal of education is to inspire and instill deep, meaningful, and long-lasting conceptual change within the knowledge landscapes of students. This commentary posits that the tools of network science could be useful in helping educators achieve this goal in two ways. First, methods from cognitive psychology and network science could be helpful in quantifying and analyzing the structure of students’ knowledge of a given discipline as a knowledge network of interconnected concepts. Second, network science methods could be relevant for investigating the developmental trajectories of knowledge structures by quantifying structural change in knowledge networks, and potentially inform instructional design in order to optimize the acquisition of meaningful knowledge as the student progresses from being a novice to an expert in the subject. This commentary provides a brief introduction to common network science measures and suggests how they might be relevant for shedding light on the cognitive processes that underlie learning and retrieval, and discusses ways in which generative network growth models could inform pedagogical strategies to enable meaningful long-term conceptual change and knowledge development among students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document