The Sociology of Intellectuals

Author(s):  
Simon Susen ◽  
Patrick Baert
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 755
Author(s):  
Toby E. Huff ◽  
Ahmad Sadri

2016 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 1039-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhidong Hao ◽  
Zhengyang Guo

AbstractUnder Xi Jinping's administration, ideological control in China has been tightened and political dissent has become increasingly difficult, especially in universities. What can professors do? Our research in one university in central China finds that professors have multifaceted identities and engage in synchronous political roles as establishment/organic, non-establishment/professional and contra-establishment/critical intellectuals, although most take on the first two roles. Our research is based on 36 interviews with professors, students and administrators from various departments of this provincial university and on an analysis of the faculty's teaching and research. This paper aims to contribute to the sociology of intellectuals and higher education by illuminating how professors, as intellectuals, engage in contemporary Chinese political discourse.


Social Forces ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 1171
Author(s):  
Fritz Ringer ◽  
Ahmad Sadri ◽  
Arthur J. Vidich

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-108
Author(s):  
Patrick Baert

In this brief essay, Patrick Baert replies to Derek Robbins’ review of his book The Existentialist Moment and of the co-authored book (with Simon Susen) The Sociology of Intellectuals. His main argument is that Robbins’ review is not only longwinded, but also suprisingly muddled, lacking in analytical clarity and precision. The essay also points out two other problems with Robbin’s confusing review. Firstly, Robbins wrongly accuses Baert of not paying attention to the content of ideas, whereas precisely the opposite is the case. Secondly, Robbins misunderstands the core presuppositions of positioning theory in that he erroneously associates the notion of positioning with conscious strategising. Baert is more sympathetic towards Robbins’ argument about the need to distinguish between different fields, but he laments Robbins’ inability to show how a more detailed attempt to draw this distinction would lead to a superior analysis of the specific historical context at the time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document