Morgan, MarcusandBaert, Patrick Conflict in the Academy: A Study in the Sociology of Intellectuals 2015 Palgrave Pivot ISBN 978-1-137-52129-3 (e-book), 978-1-137-52128-0 96-102 pp.

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-178
Author(s):  
Andreas Hess
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 755
Author(s):  
Toby E. Huff ◽  
Ahmad Sadri

2016 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 1039-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhidong Hao ◽  
Zhengyang Guo

AbstractUnder Xi Jinping's administration, ideological control in China has been tightened and political dissent has become increasingly difficult, especially in universities. What can professors do? Our research in one university in central China finds that professors have multifaceted identities and engage in synchronous political roles as establishment/organic, non-establishment/professional and contra-establishment/critical intellectuals, although most take on the first two roles. Our research is based on 36 interviews with professors, students and administrators from various departments of this provincial university and on an analysis of the faculty's teaching and research. This paper aims to contribute to the sociology of intellectuals and higher education by illuminating how professors, as intellectuals, engage in contemporary Chinese political discourse.


Social Forces ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 1171
Author(s):  
Fritz Ringer ◽  
Ahmad Sadri ◽  
Arthur J. Vidich

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-108
Author(s):  
Patrick Baert

In this brief essay, Patrick Baert replies to Derek Robbins’ review of his book The Existentialist Moment and of the co-authored book (with Simon Susen) The Sociology of Intellectuals. His main argument is that Robbins’ review is not only longwinded, but also suprisingly muddled, lacking in analytical clarity and precision. The essay also points out two other problems with Robbin’s confusing review. Firstly, Robbins wrongly accuses Baert of not paying attention to the content of ideas, whereas precisely the opposite is the case. Secondly, Robbins misunderstands the core presuppositions of positioning theory in that he erroneously associates the notion of positioning with conscious strategising. Baert is more sympathetic towards Robbins’ argument about the need to distinguish between different fields, but he laments Robbins’ inability to show how a more detailed attempt to draw this distinction would lead to a superior analysis of the specific historical context at the time.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-355
Author(s):  
Gazela Pudar-Drasko

The paper strives to explore the (non)existence of influence of intellectuals in society. Intellectuals are seen as a loose elite network of specific social actors who possess advance knowledge or creativity recognized in the cultural field of academia and/or art, hold a certain authority or power to be heard in the public, and who are publicly engaged. The aim of the paper is to fill the gap in the sociology of intellectuals and offer a possible framework for empirical research of intellectuals? influence. This framework is operationalized using three levels: self-evaluation of their own influence, estimation of their social status and intellectual authority over (primarily) elites, and finally external ?objectified? measures. The author hereby calls on the testing of the proposed model and any proposals for its improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document