An Adaptive Coach for Invention Activities

Author(s):  
Vincent Aleven ◽  
Helena Connolly ◽  
Octav Popescu ◽  
Jenna Marks ◽  
Marianna Lamnina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1111-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Y. Co ◽  
John S. Landon-Lane ◽  
Myeong-Su Yun

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 7306
Author(s):  
Eduardo González-Cabañes ◽  
Trinidad García ◽  
Celestino Rodríguez ◽  
Marcelino Cuesta ◽  
José Carlos Núñez

Invention activities can promote reflective learning processes. However, their inclusion in educational practice can generate doubts because they take up time that can otherwise be invested in explaining content, and because some students might experience frustration and anxiety while trying to solve them. This study experimentally evaluated the efficacy of invention activities in a university statistics class, considering both emotions (self-reported) and learning achieved. In total, 43 students were randomly assigned to either (a) inventing variability measures before receiving instruction about the topic of statistical variability, or (b) completing a similar problem-solving activity, but only after they had received guidance with a worked example concerning the target concepts. Students in the first condition acquired greater conceptual knowledge, which is an indicator of deep learning. The emotions experienced during the learning activities were similar in both learning conditions. However, it was notable that enjoyment during the invention phase of the invention condition was strongly associated with higher achievement. Invention activities are a promising educational strategy that require students to play an active role, and can promote deep learning. This study also provides implementation guidelines for teachers while discussing the possibilities offered by new technologies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ido Roll ◽  
Natasha G. Holmes ◽  
James Day ◽  
Doug Bonn

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine C. Chase ◽  
Helena Connolly ◽  
Marianna Lamnina ◽  
Vincent Aleven

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared L. Taylor ◽  
Karen M. Smith ◽  
Adrian P. van Stolk ◽  
George B. Spiegelman

Invention activities challenge students to tackle problems that superficially appear unrelated to the course material but illustrate underlying fundamental concepts that are fundamental to material that will be presented. During our invention activities in a first-year biology class, students were presented with problems that are parallel to those that living cells must solve, in weekly sessions over a 13-wk term. We compared students who participated in the invention activities sessions with students who participated in sessions of structured problem solving and with students who did not participate in either activity. When faced with developing a solution to a challenging and unfamiliar biology problem, invention activity students were much quicker to engage with the problem and routinely provided multiple reasonable hypotheses. In contrast the other students were significantly slower in beginning to work on the problem and routinely produced relatively few ideas. We suggest that the invention activities develop a highly valuable skill that operates at the initial stages of problem solving.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Holmes ◽  
James Day ◽  
Anthony H. K. Park ◽  
D. A. Bonn ◽  
Ido Roll
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document