Complexity as a Discourse on School Mathematics Reform

Author(s):  
Brent Davis
1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202
Author(s):  
Victor U. Odafe

The more students invest in their own learning process, the more they will learn. This widely documented view is supported by publications from the mathematics-reform community. For example, the National Research Council's (NRC) Moving beyond Myths (1991) and Everybody Counts (1989) and NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) have called for changes in the teaching and learning of mathematics.


1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-582
Author(s):  
Dominic D. Peressini

In this article, using reform recommendations that call for parental involvement as a springboard, I provide an analysis of the positioning of parents in the school mathematics reform literature. Employing Foucault's (1980) conception of “regimes of truth,” I demonstrate how the literature has created the accepted discourse for mathematics education reform. I then argue that the professionalization of teachers has distanced parents from schools and led to conflict between parents and mathematics educators and that to reconcile this conflict, ways in which parents can be included in mathematics education must be considered. It is essential first, however, to understand issues central to involving parents in mathematics education. A research agenda for parental involvement in mathematics education is presented.


1966 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 671-674
Author(s):  
C. B. Glavas

In this article the school mathematics reform in Greece is examined. The exposition is on the present phase of the reform, which is limited to the lower cycle of the high school (ages twelve to fifteen).


1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-451
Author(s):  
Peter L. Glidden

Before getting to the main point of this article, I need to make a confession: I am a product of the “new math.ȝ I had the “new math” from kindergarten all the way through high school. The “new math” influenced my understanding of what mathematics is and what doing mathematics means. Most of the time I am not conscious of this influence, but a recent experience made me nostalgic for two, interrelated ideas of the “new math.” I believe that these ideas are just as valid today as they were thirty years ago. More important, as the pendulum of school mathematics reform swings toward the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and away from any residual legacy of the “new math,” we need to retain these two ideas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document