NRC Perspectives on Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of High-Chromium, Nickel-Based Alloys

2017 ◽  
pp. 55-65
Author(s):  
Greg Oberson ◽  
Margaret Audrain ◽  
Jay Collins ◽  
Eric Reichelt
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
High Chromium ◽  
Primary Water

Mechanical Stress Improvement Process (MSIP) Used to Prevent and Mitigate Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC) in Reactor Vessel Piping at V.C. Summer

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Ray ◽  
K. Weir ◽  
C. Rice ◽  
T. Damico
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Mechanical Stress ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
The Other ◽  
Water Reactor ◽  
Improvement Process ◽  
Primary Water

During the October 2000 refueling outage at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, a leak was discovered in one of the three reactor vessel hot leg nozzle to pipe weld connections. The root cause of this leak was determined to be extensive weld repairs causing high tensile stresses throughout the pipe weld; leading to primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) of the Alloy 82/182 (Inconel). This nozzle was repaired and V.C. Summer began investigating other mitigative or repair techniques on the other nozzles. During the next refueling outage V.C. Summer took mitigative actions by applying the patented Mechanical Stress Improvement Process (MSIP) to the other hot legs. MSIP contracts the pipe on one side of the weldment, placing the inner region of the weld into compression. This is an effective means to prevent and mitigate PWSCC. Analyses were performed to determine the redistribution of residual stresses, amount of strain in the region of application, reactor coolant piping loads and stresses, and effect on equipment supports. In May 2002, using a newly designed 34-inch clamp, MSIP was successfully applied to the two hot-leg nozzle weldments. The pre- and post-MSIP NDE results were highly favorable. MSIP has been used extensively on piping in boiling water reactor (BWR) plants to successfully prevent and mitigate SCC. This includes Reactor Vessel nozzle piping over 30-inch diameter with 2.3-inch wall thickness similar in both size and materials to piping in pressurized water reactor (PWR) plants such as V.C. Summer. The application of MSIP at V.C. Summer was successfully completed and showed the process to be predictable with no significant changes in the overall operation of the plant. The pre- and post-nondestructive examination of the reactor vessel nozzle weldment showed no detrimental effects on the weldment due to the MSIP.

Weld Residual Stresses and Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Bimetal Nuclear Pipe Welds

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Brust ◽  
Paul M. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Residual Stresses ◽  
Weld Metal ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Primary Water

There have been incidents recently where cracking has been observed in the bi-metallic welds that join the hot leg to the reactor pressure vessel nozzle. The hot leg pipes are typically large diameter, thick wall pipes. Typically, an inconel weld metal is used to join the ferritic pressure vessel steel to the stainless steel pipe. The cracking, mainly confined to the inconel weld metal, is caused by corrosion mechanisms. Tensile weld residual stresses, in addition to service loads, contribute to PWSCC (Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking) crack growth. In addition to the large diameter hot leg pipe, cracking in other piping components of different sizes has been observed. For instance, surge lines and spray line cracking has been observed that has been attributed to this degradation mechanism. Here we present some models which are used to predict the PWSCC behavior in nuclear piping. This includes weld model solutions of bimetal pipe welds along with an example calculation of PWSCC crack growth in a hot leg. Risk based considerations are also discussed.

The experience and analysis of vent pipe PWSCC (primary water stress corrosion cracking) in PWR vessel head penetration

2014 ◽  
Vol 269 ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Sik Kang ◽  
Seong-Sik Hwang ◽  
Hong-Pyo Kim ◽  
Yun-Soo Lim ◽  
Jong-Sung Kim
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Head Penetration ◽  
Primary Water

Assessment of primary water stress corrosion cracking of PWR steam generator tubes

1992 ◽  
Vol 134 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 199-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.N. Shah ◽  
D.B. Lowenstein ◽  
A.P.L. Turner ◽  
S.R. Ward ◽  
J.A. Gorman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Steam Generator ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Primary Water ◽  
Steam Generator Tubes

Evaluation and Repair of Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Alloy 600/182 Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzles

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Frye ◽  
Melvin L. Arey ◽  
Michael R. Robinson ◽  
David E. Whitaker
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Boric Acid ◽  
Stress Corrosion ◽  
Stress Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Corrosion Cracking ◽  
Alloy 600 ◽  
Control Rod ◽  
Drive Mechanism ◽  
Primary Water

In February 2001, a routine visual inspection of the reactor vessel head of Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 3 identified boric acid crystals at nine of sixty-nine locations where control rod drive mechanism housings (CRDM nozzles) penetrate the head. The boric acid deposits resulted from primary coolant leaking from cracks in the nozzle attachment weld and from through-thickness cracks in the nozzle wall. A general overview of the inspection and repair process is presented and results of the metallurgical analysis are discussed in more detail. The analysis confirmed that primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) is the mechanism of failure of both the Alloy 182 weld filler material and the alloy 600 wrought base material.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document