“Negative Seeing”: Robert Smithson, Earth Art, and the Eco-Phenomenology of “Mirror Displacements”

Author(s):  
Ming-Qian Ma
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-340
Author(s):  
Daniel Katz
Keyword(s):  

This article examines Beckett's legacy in the work of Robert Smithson, stressing how the latter's “site/nonsite dialectic” seems to work through many of Beckett's concerns as played out in , but also in the “Three Dialogues with Georges Duthuit,” a work to which Smithson alludes in an oblique citation. Smithson himself stresses the debt of his “alogon” to the Beckettian “surd,” and I argue here that Smithson extends the Beckettian deconstruction of logocentrism into the realm of matter, objects, and “Earth Art.” It is in the wake of this process that he allows for a reconsideration of the local, itself more important in Beckett than commonly realized.


Transfers ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charissa N. Terranova

This essay focuses on a body of photoconceptual works from the 1960s and 1970s in which the automobile functions as a prosthetic-like aperture through which to view the world in motion. I argue that the logic of the “automotive prosthetic“ in works by Paul McCarthy, Dennis Hopper, Ed Ruscha, Jeff Wall, John Baldessari, Richard Prince, Martha Rosler, Robert Smithson, Ed Kienholz, Julian Opie, and Cory Arcangel reveals a techno-genetic understanding of conceptual art, functioning in addition and alternatively to semiotics and various philosophies of language usually associated with conceptual art. These artworks show how the automobile, movement on roads and highways, and the automotive landscape of urban sprawl have transformed the human sensorium. I surmise that the car has become a prosthetic of the human body and is a technological force in the maieusis of the posthuman subject. I offer a reading of specific works of photoconceptual art based on experience, perception, and a posthumanist subjectivity in contrast to solely understanding them according to semiotics and linguistics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 414-432
Author(s):  
Philip Hüpkes ◽  
Gabriele Dürbeck

Abstract This article focuses on an important aspect of aesthetics in the context of the Anthropocene: the situatedness of aesthetic techniques and operations within earth’s (changing) materiality. Aesthetics is not only a way of making sensible but also contributes ontologically to the world it makes sensible. In this view aesthetics does not rely on a subject’s capacity to apprehend the world as a perceptually objectifiable entity. Focusing on works by Jason deCaires Taylor (Anthropocene and La Gardinera de la Esperanza) and Robert Smithson (Spiral Jetty), the authors interrogate how artistic engagements with anthropocenic materiality and temporality have the potential to articulate a double bind between aesthetics and ontology. Both artists not only allow recipients to be confronted with complex earthly entanglements but also have a material and aesthetic impact on their respective sites. Discussing deCaires Taylor’s and Smithson’s works, the authors argue that the artists’ aesthetics is not only a way of granting experiential access to an earth that resists objectification but also a manifestation of the processes through which earth’s materiality transforms throughout time.


1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-89
Author(s):  
Alberto Velasco
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document