A Practical Approach to Testing a Natural Language System: Tools and Procedures

1995 ◽  
pp. 61-84
Author(s):  
Jane Anne Banwart ◽  
Sandra Inés Berrettoni
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1218-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Chen ◽  
Yu Gu ◽  
Xin Ji ◽  
Chao Lou ◽  
Zhiyong Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Identifying patients who meet selection criteria for clinical trials is typically challenging and time-consuming. In this article, we describe our clinical natural language processing (NLP) system to automatically assess patients’ eligibility based on their longitudinal medical records. This work was part of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) Shared-Task and Workshop on Cohort Selection for Clinical Trials. Materials and Methods The authors developed an integrated rule-based clinical NLP system which employs a generic rule-based framework plugged in with lexical-, syntactic- and meta-level, task-specific knowledge inputs. In addition, the authors also implemented and evaluated a general clinical NLP (cNLP) system which is built with the Unified Medical Language System and Unstructured Information Management Architecture. Results and Discussion The systems were evaluated as part of the 2018 n2c2-1 challenge, and authors’ rule-based system obtained an F-measure of 0.9028, ranking fourth at the challenge and had less than 1% difference from the best system. While the general cNLP system didn’t achieve performance as good as the rule-based system, it did establish its own advantages and potential in extracting clinical concepts. Conclusion Our results indicate that a well-designed rule-based clinical NLP system is capable of achieving good performance on cohort selection even with a small training data set. In addition, the investigation of a Unified Medical Language System-based general cNLP system suggests that a hybrid system combining these 2 approaches is promising to surpass the state-of-the-art performance.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horng-Ming Su ◽  
Voratas Kachitvichyanukul

1982 ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Walther von Hahn ◽  
Wolfgang Wahlster ◽  
Wolfgang Hoeppner

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Buchheit ◽  
Jeffrey Tsai ◽  
Roger Conant ◽  
Thomas Moher

1979 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Widdowson

I want to discuss two lines of enquiry in applied linguistic research which have come into prominence in recent years and which promise to have a bearing on a more learner-centred approach to language teaching pedagogy. These two lines have been pursued independently and at different points on the spectrum of applied linguistic studies. Furthermore, each one concentrates on a different aspect of natural language. I want to argue that we need to find ways of relating them if their pedagogic potential is to be effectively realized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document