Diversity and Managing Diversity in an Intergovernmental Organisation: The Mekong River Commission Case Study

Water Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1420-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mak Sithirith ◽  
Jaap Evers ◽  
Joyeeta Gupta

Water security is a key governance challenge especially in relation to transboundary rivers. While the literature elaborates on the water security concept, there is very little on how to operationalize it in the transboundary context. Hence, this paper addresses the question: How can the governance of transboundary rivers be operationalized to deal with national water security concerns? It uses a literature review and a case study focusing on dams in the Mekong tributaries, namely the Sesan, part of the 3S Basin, in Vietnam and Cambodia. The paper describes the damming process in the 3S Basin and how it threatens water security for downstream states in terms of securing the flow, volume, quality, space, and the temporal variations of the rivers and the livelihoods of river dependent communities. It examines how the Mekong River Commission (MRC) members address these issues, balance their interests and secure the free flow of the Mekong River and its tributaries. It concludes that the MRC Agreement of 1995 is an inadequate mechanism to regulate the developments of hydrological infrastructure on the shared international tributaries, and that further operationalization of the concept of water security is necessary to enable the improvement of existing cooperative regulations and mechanisms.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Boergens ◽  
Karina Nielsen ◽  
Ole Andersen ◽  
Denise Dettmering ◽  
Florian Seitz

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2645-2656 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. C. Pagano

Abstract. This study created a 13-year historical archive of operational flood forecasts issued by the Regional Flood Management and Mitigation Center (RFMMC) of the Mekong River Commission. The RFMMC issues 1- to 5-day daily deterministic river height forecasts for 22 locations throughout the wet season (June–October). When these forecasts reach near flood level, government agencies and the public are encouraged to take protective action against damages. When measured by standard skill scores, the forecasts perform exceptionally well (e.g., 1 day-ahead Nash–Sutcliffe > 0.99) although much of this apparent skill is due to the strong seasonal cycle and the narrow natural range of variability at certain locations. Five-day forecasts upstream of Phnom Penh typically have 0.8 m error standard deviation, whereas below Phnom Penh the error is typically 0.3 m. The coefficients of persistence for 1-day forecasts are typically 0.4–0.8 and 5-day forecasts are typically 0.1–0.7. RFMMC uses a series of benchmarks to define a metric of percentage satisfactory forecasts. As the benchmarks were derived based on the average error, certain locations and lead times consistently appear less satisfactory than others. Instead, different benchmarks were proposed and derived based on the 70th percentile of absolute error over the 13-year period. There are no obvious trends in the percentage of satisfactory forecasts from 2002 to 2012, regardless of the benchmark chosen. Finally, when evaluated from a categorical "crossing above/not-crossing above flood level" perspective, the forecasts have a moderate probability of detection (48% at 1 day ahead, 31% at 5 days ahead) and false alarm rate (13% at 1 day ahead, 74% at 5 days ahead).


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Boergens ◽  
Denise Dettmering ◽  
Christian Schwatke ◽  
Florian Seitz

2013 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Wang ◽  
James P. Lassoie ◽  
Shikui Dong ◽  
Stephen J. Morreale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document