A Symbolic Decision Procedure for Cryptographic Protocols with Time Stamps

Author(s):  
Liana Bozga ◽  
Cristian Ene ◽  
Yassine Lakhnech
1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clark W. Barrett ◽  
David L. Dill ◽  
Jeremy R. Levitt

Author(s):  
Ashish Joshi ◽  
Amar Kumar Mohapatra

Background & Objective: Cryptographic protocols had been evident method for ensuring con dentiality, Integrity and authentication in various digital communication systems. However the validation and analysis of such cryptographic protocols was limited to usage of formal mathematical models until few years back. Methods: In this paper, various popular cryptographic protocols have been studied. Some of these protocols (PAP, CHAP, and EAP) achieve security goals in peer to peer communication while others (RADIUS, DIAMETER and Kerberos) can work in multiparty environment. These protocols were validated and analysed over two popular security validation and analysis tools AVISPA and Scyther. The protocols were written according to their documentation using the HLPSL and SPDL for analysis over AVISPA and Scyther respectively. The results of these tools were analysed to nd the possible attack an each protocol. Afterwards The execution time analysis of the protocols were done by repeating the experiment for multiple iterations over the command line versions of these tools.As the literature review suggested, this research also validates that using password based protocols (PAP) is faster in terms of execution time as compared to other methods, Usage of nonces tackles the replay attack and DIAMETER is secure than RADIUS. Results and Conclusion: The results also showed us that DIAMETER is faster than RADIUS. Though Kerberos protocol was found to safe, the results tell us that it is compromisable under particular circumstances.


2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S152-S152
Author(s):  
S Fathima ◽  
A R Gardner ◽  
A J Sohn ◽  
R Benavides

Abstract Introduction/Objective In teaching hospitals, patients receive direct care from a succession of different physicians, each of whom may order diagnostic tests on the same patient resulting in multiple physicians unknowingly ordering the same test in the same time period, leading to overutilization. We examined the association of test-ordering by multiple physicians with duplication of two tests, Beta D-Glucan (BDG) and CMV Viral Load by PCR non blood, as aid for detection of fungal and cytomegaloviral infections, respectively Methods Retrospective medical records at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas were examined in between 10/1/2019- 10/30/2019. A total 167 test orders were identified for CMV Viral Load non blood and BDG presence in blood. Each medical record was assessed for frequency of ordering along with the physicians who ordered them Results A total 167 tests were ordered in which, 120 times BDG was ordered and 52 times CMV was ordered. Singleton orders were noted in 85(50%) instances of BDG & 30(17%) for CMV.Multiple test orders were 44 (25%) for BDG and 8 (4%) for CMV respectively. Both CMV and BDG were ordered together 57 times. The time stamps of multiple test orders in individual patients was assessed for instances of orders that were less than 3 days apart and analysis showed out of the 44 multiple test orders, 34% (15) test orders were ordered less than 3 days apart and 66%(29) tests were ordered more than 3 days apart for BDG. Upon chart review, most of these quickly successive orders were by different physicians. The estimated costs of the duplicate orders are 4334.0$ & 1104.16$ for BDG and CMV respectively. Conclusion CMV and BDG are commonly ordered on many patients. Analysis shows that many times, physicians order testing when the same test has been ordered very recently by a separate physician. Note that for both tests, retesting in less than three days is not normally indicated, however this happens often, especially for BDG. This is most likely due to difficulty in determining within the EHR what tests are drawn and “pending’ but not yet finalized and reported. With usage of prompts/ alerts in EMR that warn of existing “pending’ orders by another caregiver, the frequency of duplicate test ordering for the same patient may be reduced, in turn reducing the costs of healthcare.


1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-282
Author(s):  
Y.S. Ramakrishna ◽  
L.E. Moser ◽  
L.K. Dillon ◽  
P.M. Melliar-Smith ◽  
G. Kutty

We present an automata-theoretic decision procedure for Since/Until Temporal Logic (SUTL), a linear-time propositional temporal logic with strong non-strict since and until operators. The logic, which is intended for specifying and reasoning about computer systems, employs neither next nor previous operators. Such operators obstruct the use of hierarchical abstraction and refinement and make reasoning about concurrency difficult. A proof of the soundness and completeness of the decision procedure is given, and its complexity is analyzed.


Author(s):  
Karel Wouters ◽  
Bart Preneel ◽  
Ana Isabel González-Tablas ◽  
Arturo Ribagorda
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document