A Quality Assurance Tool Based on kV- and MV-Image Analysis for a Linear Accelerator Including an Integrated IGRT System

Author(s):  
P. Winkler ◽  
C. Hofer ◽  
R. Stollberger
2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1352-S1353
Author(s):  
H.L. Riis ◽  
A. Fietje ◽  
K.H. Engstrøm ◽  
U. Bernchou ◽  
C. Brink ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michael G. Mauk

Image capturing, processing, and analysis have numerous uses in solar cell research, device and process development and characterization, process control, and quality assurance and inspection. Solar cell image processing is expanding due to the increasing performance (resolution, sensitivity, spectral range) and low-cost of commercial CCD and infrared cameras. Methods and applications are discussed, with primary focus on monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon solar cells using visible and infrared (thermography) wavelengths. The most prominent applications relate to mapping of minority carrier lifetime, shunts, and defects in solar cell wafers, in various stages of the manufacturing process. Other applications include measurements of surface texture and reflectivity, surface cleanliness, integrity of metallization lines, uniformity of coatings, and crystallographic texture and grain size. Image processing offers the capability to assess large-areas (> 100 cm2) with a non-contact, fast (~ 1 second), and modest cost. The challenge is to quantify and interpret the image data in order to better inform device design, process engineering, and quality control. Many promising solar cell technologies fail in the transition from laboratory to factory due to issues related to scale-up in area and manufacturing throughput. Image analysis provides an effective method to assess areal uniformity, device-to-device reproducibility, and defect densities. More integration of image analysis from research devices to field testing of modules will continue as the photovoltaics industry matures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Court ◽  
He Wang ◽  
David Aten ◽  
Derek Brown ◽  
Hannelie MacGregor ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 138-149
Author(s):  
P. Niyas ◽  
K. K. Abdullah ◽  
M. P. Noufal ◽  
R. Vysakh

AbstractAimThe Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), primarily used for patient setup during radiotherapy sessions is also used for dosimetric measurements. In the present study, the feasibility of EPID in both machine and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) are investigated. We have developed a comprehensive software tool for effective utilisation of EPID in our institutional QA protocol.Materials and methodsPortal Vision aS1000, amorphous silicon portal detector attached to Clinac iX—Linear Accelerator (LINAC) was used to measure daily profile and output constancy, various Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) checks and patient plan verification. Different QA plans were generated with the help of Eclipse Treatment Planning System (TPS) and MLC shaper software. The indigenously developed MATLAB programs were used for image analysis. Flatness, symmetry, output constancy, Field Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) and fluence comparison were studied from images obtained from TPS and EPID dosimetry.ResultsThe 3 years institutional data of profile constancy and patient-specific QA measured using EPID were found within the acceptable limits. The daily output of photon beam correlated with the output obtained through solid phantom measurements. The Pearson correlation coefficients are 0.941 (p = 0.0001), 0.888 (p = 0.0188) and 0.917 (p = 0.0007) for the years of 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The accuracy of MLC for shaping complex treatment fields was studied in terms of FWHM at different portions of various fields, showed good agreement between TPS-generated and EPID-measured MLC positions. The comparison of selected patient plans in EPID with an independent 2D array detector system showed statistically significant correlation between these two systems. Percentage difference between TPS computed and EPID measured fluence maps calculated for number of patients using MATLAB code also exhibited the validity of those plans for treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 10-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Nguyen ◽  
Florentin Josserand Pietri ◽  
Cristina Sporea ◽  
Mustapha Khodri

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 025011
Author(s):  
J Fazakerley ◽  
J N H Brunt ◽  
J Graham ◽  
A Reilly ◽  
B M Moores

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document