Retinal Slip

2013 ◽  
pp. 3407-3407 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Slip

Motor Coding in Floccular Climbing Fibers

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 2342-2351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beerend Winkelman ◽  
Maarten Frens
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Inferior Olive ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
Climbing Fibers ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Motor Component ◽  
Prepositus Hypoglossi ◽  
Sensorimotor Information ◽  
Sensory Encoding ◽  
Oculomotor Learning

The climbing fibers (CFs) that project from the dorsal cap of the inferior olive (IO) to the flocculus of the cerebellar cortex have been reported to be purely sensory, encoding “retinal slip.” However, a clear oculomotor projection from the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi (NPH) to the IO has been shown. We therefore studied the sensorimotor information that is present in the CF signal. We presented rabbits with visual motion noise stimuli to break up the tight relation between instantaneous retinal slip and eye movement. Strikingly, the information about the motor behavior in the CF signal more than doubled that of the sensory component and was time-locked more tightly. The contribution of oculomotor signals was independently confirmed by analysis of spontaneous eye movements in the absence of visual input. The motor component of the CF code is essential to distinguish unexpected slip from self-generated slip, which is a prerequisite for proper oculomotor learning.

Neurons in the cat pretectum that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus are activated during saccades

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 2907-2918 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Visual Stimulus ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Response Latencies ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate

1. Neurons in the pretectal nuclear complex that project to the ipsilateral dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) were identified by antidromic activation after electrical LGNd stimulation in awake cats, and their response properties were characterized to retinal image shifts elicited either by external visual stimulus movements or during spontaneous saccadic eye movements on a stationary visual stimulus, and to saccades in darkness. Eye position was monitored with the use of a scleral search coil and care was taken to assure stability of the eyes during presentation of moving visual stimuli. 2. Of a total sample of 134 cells recorded, 27 neurons were antidromically activated by electrical LGNd stimulation. In addition, responses from neurons that were not activated from the LGNd were also analyzed, including 19 “retinal slip” cells, which selectively respond to slow horizontal stimulus movements, and 21 “jerk” cells, which are specifically activated by rapid stimulus shifts. All recorded neurons were located in the nucleus of the optic tract and in the posterior pretectal nucleus. 3. In the light, neurons identified as projecting to the LGNd responded maximally to saccadic eye movements and to externally generated sudden shifts of large visual stimuli. Slow stimulus drifts did not activate these neurons. Response latencies were shorter and peak activities were increased during saccades compared with pure visual stimulation. No systematic correlation between response latency, response duration, or the number of spikes in the response and saccade direction, saccade amplitude, or saccade duration was found. Saccades and rapid stimulus shifts in the light also activated jerk cells but not retinal slip cells. 4. All 27 antidromically activated neurons also responded to spontaneous saccadic eye movements in complete darkness. Responses to saccades in the dark, however, had longer response latencies and lower peak activities than responses to saccades in light. As in the light, response parameters in darkness seemed not to code specific saccade parameters. Cells that were not activated from LGNd were found to be unresponsive to saccades in the dark. 5. According to their specific activation by saccades in darkness, LGNd-projecting pretectal neurons are termed “saccade neurons” to distinguish them from other pretectal cell populations, in particular from jerk neurons, which show similar response properties in light. 6. The saccade-related activation of pretectal saccade neurons may be used to modulate visual responses of LGNd relay cells following saccadic eye movements. Because the pretectogeniculate projection in cat most likely is GABAergic and terminates on inhibitory LGNd interneurons, its activation may lead to a saccade-locked disinhibition of relay cells. This input could counter the strong inhibition induced in the LGNd after shifts of gaze direction and lead to a resetting of LGNd cell activity.

Context Compensation in the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Active Head Rotations

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 2904-2917 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. P. Medendorp ◽  
J.A.M. Van Gisbergen ◽  
S. Van Pelt ◽  
C.C.A.M. Gielen
Keyword(s):  
Human Subjects ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Target Distance ◽  
General Context ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Gaze Stabilization ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
Head Rotations

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) needs to modulate its gain depending on target distance to prevent retinal slip during head movements. We investigated gain modulation (context compensation) for binocular gaze stabilization in human subjects during voluntary yaw and pitch head rotations. Movements of each eye were recorded, both when attempting to maintain gaze on a small visual target at straight-ahead in a darkened room and after its disappearance (remembered target). In the analysis, we relied on a binocular coordinate system yielding a version and a vergence component. We examined how frequency and target distance, approached here by using vergence angle, affected the gain and phase of the version component of the VOR and compared the results to the requirements for ideal performance. Linear regression analysis on the version gain-vergence relationship yielded a slope representing the influence of target proximity and an intercept corresponding to the response at zero vergence (“default gain”). The slope of the fitted relationship, divided by the geometrically required slope, provided a measure for the quality of version context compensation (“context gain”). In both yaw and pitch experiments, we found default version gains close to one even for the remembered target condition, indicating that the active VOR for far targets is already close to ideal without visual support. In near target experiments, the presence of visual feedback yielded near unity context gains, indicating close to optimal performance (retinal slip <0.4°/s). For remembered targets, the context gain deteriorated but was still superior to performance in corresponding passive studies reported in the literature. In general, context compensation in the remembered target paradigm was better for vertical than for horizontal head rotations. The phase delay of version eye velocity relative to head velocity was small (∼2°) for both horizontal and vertical head movements. Analysis of the vergence data from the near target experiments showed that context compensation took into account that the two eyes require slightly different VORs. In thediscussion, comparison of the present default VOR gains and context gains with data from earlier passive studies has led us to propose a limited role for efference copies during self-generated movements. We also discuss how our analysis can provide a framework for evaluating two different hypotheses for the generation of binocular VOR eye movements.

Wide-field nondirectional visual units in the pretectum: do they suppress ocular following of saccade-induced visual stimulation

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 1448-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Ibbotson ◽  
R. F. Mark
Keyword(s):  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Spontaneous Activities ◽  
Ocular Following ◽  
Temporal Stimuli

1. Direction-selective neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) provide motion signals for controlling ocular following responses. When stimulated at low temporal and high spatial frequencies of motion (slow speeds), these retinal-slip neurons produce directional responses. When stimulated by motion at high temporal and low spatial frequencies (the visual conditions during saccades) the spontaneous activities of the neurons are inhibited by motion in all directions. A second class of neurons in, or near, the NOT have large receptive fields, are nondirectional, and are tuned to detect the same spatial and temporal stimuli that induce nondirectional inhibition in the retinal-slip neurons. We suggest that the nondirectional cells provide an inhibitory input for the retinal-slip neurons and therefore prevent ocular following of the visual displacements that accompany saccades.

Retinal slip velocities in congenital nystagmus

1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard V. Abadi ◽  
Ralph Worfolk
Keyword(s):  
Congenital Nystagmus ◽  
Retinal Slip

Visually induced adaptive changes in primate saccadic oculomotor control signals

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 940-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Optican ◽  
F. A. Miles
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Time Constant ◽  
Retinal Image ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Oculomotor Control ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Ocular Motor ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Adaptive Changes

Saccades are the rapid eye movements used to change visual fixation. Normal saccades end abruptly with very little postsaccadic ocular drift, but acute ocular motor deficits can cause the eyes to drift appreciably after a saccade. Previous studies in both patients and monkeys with peripheral ocular motor deficits have demonstrated that the brain can suppress such postsaccadic drifts. Ocular drift might be suppressed in response to visual and/or proprioceptive feedback of position and/or velocity errors. This study attempts to characterize the adaptive mechanism for suppression of postsaccadic drift. The responses of seven rhesus monkeys were studied to postsaccadic retinal slip induced by horizontal exponential movements of a full-field stimulus. After several hours of saccade-related retinal image slip, the eye movements of the monkeys developed a zero-latency, compensatory postsaccadic ocular drift. This ocular drift was still evident in the dark, although smaller (typically 15% of the amplitude of the antecedent saccade, up to a maximum drift of 8 degrees). Retinal slip alone, without a net displacement of the image, was sufficient to elicit these adaptive changes, and compensation for leftward and rightward saccades was independent. It took several days to complete adaptation, but recovery (in the light) was much quicker. The decay of this adaptation in darkness was very slow; after 3 days the ocular drift was reduced by less than 50%. The time constants of single exponential curve fits to adaptation time courses of data from five animals were 35 h for acquisition, 4 h for recovery, and at least 40 h for decay in darkness. Descriptions of the central innervation for a saccade are usually simplified to only two components: a pulse and a step. It has been hypothesized that suppression of pathological postsaccadic drift is achieved by adjusting the ratio of the pulse to the step of innervation (19, 26). However, we show that the time constant of the ocular drift is influenced by the time constant of the adapting stimulus, which cannot be explained by the simple pulse-step model of saccadic innervation. A more realistic representation of the saccadic innervation has three components: a pulse, an exponential slide, and a step. Normal saccades were accurately simulated by a fourth-order, linear model of the ocular motor plant driven by such a pulse-slide-step combination. Saccades made after prolonged exposure to optically induced retinal image slip could also be simulated by properly adjusting the slide and step components.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Binocular Kinematics of Torsional Vestibular Nystagmus During Convergence on Head-Fixed Targets in Humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Bergamin ◽  
D. Straumann
Keyword(s):  
Human Subjects ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Fixed Target ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Retinal Slip ◽  
Gain Reduction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Eye Velocity

When a human subject is oscillated about the nasooccipital axis and fixes upon targets along the horizontal head-fixed meridian, angular eye velocity includes a vertical component that increases with the horizontal eccentricity of the line-of-sight. This vertical eye movement component is necessary to prevent retinal slip. We asked whether fixation on a near head-fixed target during the same torsional vestibular stimulation would lead to differences of vertical eye movements between the right and the left eye, as the directions of the two lines-of-sight are not parallel during convergence. Healthy human subjects ( n = 6) were oscillated (0.3 Hz, ±30°) about the nasooccipital axis on a three-dimensional motor-driven turntable. Binocular movements were recorded using the dual search coil technique. A head-fixed laser dot was presented 1.4 m (far head-fixed target) or 0.25 m (near head-fixed target) in front of the right eye. We found highly significant ( P < 0.01) correlations (R binocular = 0.8, monocular = 0.59) between the convergence angle and the difference of the vertical eye velocity between the two eyes. The slope of the fitted linear regression between the two parameters ( s = 0.45) was close to the theoretical slope necessary to prevent vertical retinal slippage (predicted s = 0.5). Covering the left eye did not significantly change the slope ( s = 0.52). In addition, there was a marked gain reduction (∼35%) of the torsional vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) between viewing the far and the near targets, confirming earlier results by others. There was no difference in torsional gain reduction between the two eyes. Lenses of +3 dpt positioned in front of both eyes to decrease the amount of accommodation did not further change the gain of the torsional VOR. In conclusion, ocular convergence on a near head-fixed target during torsional vestibular stimulation leads to deviations in vertical angular velocity between the two eyes necessary to prevent vertical double vision. The vertical deviation velocity is mainly linked to the amount of convergence, since it also occurs during monocular viewing of the near head-fixed target. This suggests that convergence during vestibular stimulation automatically leads to an alignment of binocular rotation axes with the visual axes independent of retinal slip.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document