Modelling Multi-Criteria Decision Making Ability of Agents in Agent-Based Rice Pest Risk Assessment Model

Author(s):  
Vinh Gia Nhi Nguyen ◽  
Hiep Xuan Huynh ◽  
Alexis Drogoul
2020 ◽  
pp. 218-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley Wing Chi Tsang ◽  
Wing Bun Lee ◽  
Eric Tsui

Intellectual Capital (IC) is becoming more widely understood by the academic and business communities, especially its important role in value creation of an organization. However, few people are aware that IC, if not managed properly, may also pose threats, sometime serious, to an organization. Knowledge leakage from an organization, for example, may come about when an experienced employee leaves for another job. Knowledge leakage is pervasive throughout an organization but is seldom noticed until the consequence is felt. This intellectual capital risk has to be systematically and effectively identified, assessed and controlled in the whole value chain of an organization. An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) based multi-dimensional decision making and assessment model is developed to determine knowledge leakage risk in an organization.


Author(s):  
Kao-Yi Shen ◽  
Yen-Ching Chuang ◽  
Tao-Hsin Tung

From the clinical viewpoint, the statistical approach is still the cornerstone for exploring many diseases. This study was conducted to explore the risk factors related to acute kidney injury (AKI) for elderly patients using the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Ten nephrologists from a teaching hospital in Taipei took part in forming the AKI risk assessment model. The key findings are: (1) Comorbidity and Laboratory Values would influence Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; (2) Frailty is the highest influential AKI risk factor for elderly patients; and (3) Elderly patients could enhance their daily activities and nutrition to improve frailty and lower AKI risk. Furthermore, we illustrate how to apply MCDM methods to retrieve clinical experience from seasoned doctors, which may serve as a knowledge-based system to support clinical prognoses. In conclusion, this study has shed light on integrating multiple research approaches to assist medical decision-making in clinical practice.


2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Lin Hsueh ◽  
Jen-Rong Lee ◽  
Yu-Lung Chen

Reusing abandoned public buildings is a positive strategy in sustainable urban development. An appropriate assessment method is needed to reduce the risks of redeveloping derelict public properties. The Delphi method is an optimal group decision-making technique; whereas the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is useful for solving multicriteria decision-making problems. In addition, fuzzy logic manages artificial uncertainty and ambiguity, where an explicit number or ratio can express the level of preference. This study uses the Delphi method, fuzzy logic, and AHP (DFAHP) as a risk assessment model to redevelop derelict public buildings. The DFAHP provides an objective reference for investment decisions and is beneficial in reducing the risk of the public sector investing in the reuse of abandoned public buildings, in aiding in reuse cases that revitalize urban economic development, and in appreciating the value of sustainable city development.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieun Ryu ◽  
Eun Joo Yoon ◽  
Chan Park ◽  
Dong Kun Lee ◽  
Seong Woo Jeon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document