scholarly journals Cell Orientation Entropy (COrE): Predicting Biochemical Recurrence from Prostate Cancer Tissue Microarrays

Author(s):  
George Lee ◽  
Sahirzeeshan Ali ◽  
Robert Veltri ◽  
Jonathan I. Epstein ◽  
Christhunesa Christudass ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
S. Minner ◽  
M.C. Tsourlakis ◽  
J. Müller ◽  
L. Burkhardt ◽  
P. Tennstedt ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Martin Burchardt ◽  
Rainer Engers ◽  
Mirko Mueller ◽  
Tatjana Burchardt ◽  
Rolf Ackermann ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 200 (4) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
R. Engers ◽  
M. Burchardt ◽  
M. Mueller ◽  
T. Burchardt ◽  
R. Ackermann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Arvaniti ◽  
Kim S. Fricker ◽  
Michael Moret ◽  
Niels J. Rupp ◽  
Thomas Hermanns ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Gleason grading system remains the most powerful prognostic predictor for patients with prostate cancer since the 1960’s. Its application requires highly-trained pathologists, is tedious and yet suffers from limited inter-pathologist reproducibility, especially for the intermediate Gleason score 7. Automated annotation procedures constitute a viable solution to remedy these limitations.In this study, we present a deep learning approach for automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Our system was trained using detailed Gleason annotations on a discovery cohort of 641 patients and was then evaluated on an independent test cohort of 245 patients annotated by two pathologists. On the test cohort, the inter-annotator agreements between the model and each pathologist, quantified via Cohen’s quadratic kappa statistic, were 0.75 and 0.71 respectively, comparable with the inter-pathologist agreement (kappa=0.71). Furthermore, the model’s Gleason score assignments achieved pathology expert-level stratification of patients into prognostically distinct groups, on the basis of disease-specific survival data available for the test cohort.Overall, our study shows promising results regarding the applicability of deep learning-based solutions towards more objective and reproducible prostate cancer grading, especially for cases with heterogeneous Gleason patterns.


2011 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1576-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Ishiguro ◽  
Kazunori Akimoto ◽  
Yoji Nagashima ◽  
Eriko Kagawa ◽  
Takeshi Sasaki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barrett Eichler ◽  
Morgan Rothschadl ◽  
Elizabeth Menzel ◽  
Kalista Vanden Berge

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e306
Author(s):  
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah* ◽  
Ulrich Wolffgang ◽  
Jonathan Schmitz ◽  
Veronique Ouellet ◽  
Feryel Azzi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 1527-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Eckstein ◽  
◽  
Verena Sailer ◽  
Boye Schnack Nielsen ◽  
Thomas Wittenberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Markus Bauer ◽  
Sebastian Zürner ◽  
Georg Popp ◽  
Glen Kristiansen ◽  
Ulf-Dietrich Braumann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document