Os odontoideum: CT and MRI demonstration of the transverse ligament

Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Dietemann ◽  
H. Zhu ◽  
I. Bricout ◽  
S. Athale ◽  
C. Romero ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Dlouhy ◽  
Bruno A. Policeni ◽  
Arnold H. Menezes

OBJECTIVEOs odontoideum (OO) is a craniovertebral junction (CVJ) abnormality in which an ossicle (small bone) is cranial to a hypoplastic dens by a variable gap. This abnormality can result in instability, which may be reducible or irreducible. What leads to irreducibility in OO is unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to better understand the causes of irreducibility in OO.METHODSA retrospective review was conducted, which identified more than 200 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for OO between 1978 and 2015 at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Only the 41 patients who had irreducible OO were included in this study. All inpatient and outpatient records were retrospectively reviewed, and patient demographics, clinical presentation, radiographic findings, surgical treatment, and operative findings were recorded and analyzed.RESULTSThe cohort of 41 patients who were found to have irreducible OO included both children and adults. A majority of patients were adults (61% were 18 years or older). Clinical presentation included neck pain and headache in the majority of patients (93%). Weakness, sensory disturbances, and myelopathy were invariably present in all 41 patients (100%). Down syndrome was much more common in the pediatric cohort than in the adult cohort; of the 16 pediatric patients, 6 had Down syndrome (38%), and none of the adults did. Of the 16 pediatric patients, 5 had segmentation failure (31%) in the subaxial spine, and none of the adults did. A form of atlantoaxial dislocation was seen in all cases. On CT imaging, atlantoaxial facets were dislocated in all 41 cases but did not have osseous changes that would have prevented reduction. On MRI, the transverse ligament was identified anterior and inferior to the ossicle and superior to the hypoplastic odontoid process in all cases in which these studies were available (i.e., post-MRI era; 36 of 36 cases). The ligament was hypointense on T2-weighted images but also had an associated hyperintense signal on T2 images. Intraoperatively, the transverse ligament was identified anterior and inferior to the ossicle and superior to the hypoplastic odontoid process in all 41 cases.CONCLUSIONSIn the largest series to date of irreducible OO and the only study to examine variable factors that lead to irreducibility in OO, the authors found that the position of the transverse ligament anterior and inferior to the ossicle is the most common factor in the irreducibility of OO. The presence of granulation tissue and of the dystopic variant of OO is also associated with irreducibility. The presence of Down syndrome and segmentation failure probably leads to faster progression of ligamentous incompetence and therefore earlier presentation of instability and irreducibility. This is the first study in which intraoperative findings regarding the transverse ligament have been correlated with MRI.


Author(s):  
Murat Guntel ◽  
Hanifi Bayarogullari

Aim: We aimed to identify dislocation, myelomalacia, and other congenital pathologies that may cause neurological complications arising from the odontoid process in the craniocervical junction (CVJ) of patients who were performed cervical tomography due to various complaints. Materials and Methods: Patients who were performed cervical CT with various complaints between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively screened and evaluated, from the hospital registry system. Segmentation and fusion anomalies arising from the odontoid process in the craniovertebral junction area, as well as other accompanying pathologies such as subluxation, dislocation, compression to the spinal cord, and myelomalacia were also recorded. An additional 1.5 Tesla cervical MRI was performed for the 12 patients with os odontoideum. Radiological evaluation was performed on the workstation by an experienced radiologist. Results: 2525 patients with cervical CT were included in the study. 67 of these patients had congenital anomalies at the CVJ. 13 of 67 patients had os odontoideum, 38 had Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS). Atlanto-occipital assimilation (AOA) and KFS often saw together. Only AOA was observed in 16 cases. Neck pain and limitation of movement were the most common findings in patients with congenital anomalies in the CVJ region. Conclusion: Congenital anomalies at the CVJ region, although rare, can cause mortality or morbidity. Cervical CT and MRI studies on the CVJ region should be evaluated carefully by the clinicians due to the risk of various complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cunha Júnior AL ◽  
◽  
Silva Champs AP ◽  
Meirelles Mello C ◽  
Barduco Carvalho CM ◽  
...  

Background: Craniocervical Junction (CCJ) imaging interpretation in patients with Genetic Skeletal Disorders (GSDs) is challenging due to bone tissue disorganization. CCJ abnormalities and spinal cord compression present potential risks. Purpose: To describe and compare CCJ measurements in patients with GSDs using XR, CT and MRI. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational and analytical study prospectively included 287 participants. Clinical evaluation, spine XR, CCJ dynamic CT, and brain and spinal cord MRI data were recorded. The participants were separated into groups with and without cervical Spinal Cord Injury (cSCI). Three craniometry measurements were performed with each imaging method, and the reliability and reproducibility were analyzed. Results: cSCI was identified in 4.5%. Spinal canal stenosis at C2 (78.8%), a narrowed foramen magnum (12,5%), os odontoideum (5.9%), ventral cervicomedullary encroachment by the odontoid (20.2%), and basilar impression/invagination (12.9%) were associated with an increased chance of cSCI. CT showed the highest accuracy for bone abnormality diagnoses. The cutoff points for the spinal canal to diagnose cSCI were 17.3 mm with XR, 12.9 mm with CT and 10.4 mm with MRI. Conclusion: CT showed good reliability and reproducibility in evaluating the CCJ in GSDs. XR presented more limitations but provided complementary data to MRI.


Skull Base ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mokry ◽  
H. Stammberger ◽  
W. Köle ◽  
P. Reittner

Skull Base ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Koppula ◽  
Ameet Singh ◽  
Fabio Roberti
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Mo Goo ◽  
Seung Hyup Kim ◽  
Man Chung Han

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document