Muscle Reattachment — Especially the Gluteal Muscles — After Proximal Femoral Resection and Replacement by Tumor Prosthesis

Limb Salvage ◽  
1991 ◽  
pp. 395-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Schreiber ◽  
G. U. Exner ◽  
A. R. von Hochstetter
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Prosthesis ◽  
Femoral Resection

Proximal Femoral Resection for the Painful Dislocated Hip in Cerebral Palsy

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Dartnell ◽  
J. Mark H. Paterson ◽  
Nicholas Magill ◽  
Fabian Norman-Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Femoral Resection

Cortical Atrophy Related to Tumor Prosthesis in Skeletally Immature Osteosarcoma Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanlim Kim ◽  
Ilkyu Han ◽  
Hwan-Seong Cho ◽  
Seungcheol Kang ◽  
Han-Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cortical Atrophy ◽  
Skeletally Immature ◽  
Tumor Prosthesis

scholarly journals Tibial Growth Disturbance Following Distal Femoral Resection and Expandable Endoprosthetic Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (22) ◽  
pp. e72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Arteau ◽  
Valerae O. Lewis ◽  
Bryan S. Moon ◽  
Robert L. Satcher ◽  
Justin E. Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoprosthetic Reconstruction ◽  
Growth Disturbance ◽  
Distal Femoral Resection ◽  
Femoral Resection

scholarly journals The Role of Nickel-titanium Shape Memory Alloy Embracing Fixator in Determination of the Implantation Angle of Hip Tumor Prosthesis Stem Following Tumor Resection and the Analysis of Its Efficacy: a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Panyu Zhou ◽  
Demeng Xia ◽  
Yunyun Wang ◽  
Sheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shape Memory Alloy ◽  
Shape Memory ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Prosthetic Replacement ◽  
Limb Function ◽  
Tumor Prosthesis

Abstract Background: To explore the role of nickel-titanium(NiTi) shape memory alloy embracing fixator in determination of implantation angle of hip tumor prosthesis stem and analyze its efficacy. Methods: 36 patients with proximal femur tumor were treated with extended tumor resection and prosthetic replacement. 14 patients received prosthetic replacements with the embracing fixators fixing between the junction of the prosthesis stem and the femur temporarily, while the other 22 patients received the same replacements but without the fixators. Following aspects were compared: occurrence of complications, limb function and active hip ROM.Results: There are fewer cases of hip dislocation in the group received prosthetic replacements with the use of embracing fixators. Occurrence of deep infection presented no difference between the two groups. Better limb function and higher active range of motion (ROM) on abduction or flexion were also found in the group using embracing fixators. Conclusion: Ni-Ti shape memory alloy embracing fixator plays a key part in assisting the accurate implantation angle of the prosthesis stem in the prosthetic replacement. The prosthesis stem can be adjusted to the optimal angle with the help of the embracing fixator. Patients have lower chance of dislocation, better limb function, and higher active hip ROM. Trial registration: retrospectively registered.

Tumor Prosthesis for the Shoulder

1987 ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Burri
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Prosthesis

Errors in Knee Alignment Using Fixed Femoral Resection Angles

Orthopedics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. e644-e648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Curtin ◽  
Thomas K. Fehring ◽  
Jessica Lauber
Keyword(s):  
Knee Alignment ◽  
Femoral Resection

Does the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improve outcomes in TKA?

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (6_Supple_A) ◽  
pp. 24-30
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Livermore ◽  
Jill A. Erickson ◽  
Brenna Blackburn ◽  
Christopher L. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ligament Balancing ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Distal Femoral Resection ◽  
Sequential Addition ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Femoral Resection ◽  
Group 1

Aims A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 371 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially. A historical control group, with the use of intramedullary guides for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided ligament balancing, was compared with a group using accelerometer-based navigation for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided balancing (group 1), and one using navigated femoral resection and sensor-guided balancing (group 2). Primary outcome measures were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores measured preoperatively and at six weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The position of the components and the mechanical axis of the limb were measured postoperatively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), haematocrit change, and complications were also recorded. Results There were 194 patients in the control group, 103 in group 1, and 74 in group 2. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the groups. Patients in group 2 had significantly higher baseline mental health subscores than control and group 1 patients (53.2 vs 50.2 vs 50.2, p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any PROMs at six weeks or 12 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the rate of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), complication rates, postoperative ROM, or blood loss. There were fewer mechanical axis outliers in groups 1 and 2 (25.2%, 14.9% respectively) versus control (28.4%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). Conclusion The sequential addition of navigation of the distal femoral cut and sensor-guided ligament balancing did not improve short-term PROMs, radiological outcomes, or complication rates compared with conventional techniques. The costs of these added technologies may not be justified. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):24–30.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document