Liposomal Amphotericin B (AMBISOME) in Patients with Severe Neutropenia and Antibiotic Resistant Fever

Author(s):  
U. Hahn ◽  
A. Deboben ◽  
G. Baldauf ◽  
H. Goldschmidt ◽  
R. Haas ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S458-S459
Author(s):  
Ann-Marie Idusuyi ◽  
Christopher McCoy ◽  
Howard Gold

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMIs) including Aspergillus spp. are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Voriconazole is recommended as first line treatment for primary IA. Liposomal amphotericin B and isavuconazole are also recommended alternative therapies. Posaconazole has activity against mold species including those not covered by voriconazole, is available as an IV and oral formulation with a distinct adverse effect profile making it a potential effective alternative for treatment. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of treatment of invasive mold infections (IMIs) with posaconazole compared to standard of care (voriconazole, isavuconazole, liposomal amphotericin B). Methods A retrospective, single center, cohort study was completed to evaluate patients with IMIs treated with posaconazole versus those treated with standard of care therapy. Medication orders for posaconazole or standard of care therapy between January 2012 and December 2020 were identified from a clinical data repository. Only patients with antifungal orders with a listed indication for “treatment of fungal infection” were included. Data collected for each group included baseline demographics, underlying conditions, site of infection, type of mold, therapeutic drug monitoring and classification of IMI. Results A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 35 patients in the posaconazole group and 85 patients in the SOC group. Baseline characteristics were similar except for increased severe neutropenia in the posaconazole group (p< 0.0001), more probable IMIs in the SOC group (p=0.009) and more possible IMIs in the posaconazole group (p=0.043). In the posaconazole group 37.1% (13/35) of patients were treatment experienced vs. 29.4% (25/85) of patients in the SOC group. More patients achieved a complete/partial response in the SOC group compared to the posaconazole group (p=0.0001) and more patients experienced treatment failure in the posaconazole group (p=0.01). A higher proportion of patients experienced adverse effects in the SOC group compared to the posaconazole group (p=0.0001). Conclusion Posaconazole was not as effective as SOC in treating invasive mold infections but patients experienced comparatively fewer adverse events. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Tuan Quang Nguyen ◽  
Van Lam Nguyen ◽  
Thai Son Nguyen ◽  
Thi Minh Hue Pham ◽  
◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 2420-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl V. Clemons ◽  
Raymond A. Sobel ◽  
Paul L. Williams ◽  
Demosthenes Pappagianis ◽  
David A. Stevens

ABSTRACT The efficacy of intravenously administered liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome [AmBi]) for the treatment of experimental coccidioidal meningitis was compared with those of oral fluconazole (FLC) and intravenously administered conventional amphotericin B (AMB). Male New Zealand White rabbits were infected by intracisternal inoculation of arthroconidia of Coccidioides immitis. Starting 5 days postinfection, animals received one of the following: 5% dextrose water diluent; AMB given at 1 mg/kg of body weight; AmBi given at 7.5, 15, or 22.5 mg/kg intravenously three times per week for 3 weeks; or oral FLC given at 80 mg/kg for 19 days. One week after the cessation of therapy, all survivors were euthanatized, the numbers of CFU remaining in the spinal cord and brain were determined, and histological analyses were performed. All AmBi-, FLC-, or AMB-treated animals survived and had prolonged lengths of survival compared with those for the controls (P < 0.0001). Treated groups had significantly lower numbers of white blood cells and significantly lower protein concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid compared with those for the controls (P < 0.01 to 0.0005) and had fewer clinical signs of infection (e.g., weight loss, elevated temperature, and neurological abnormalities including motor abnormalities). The mean histological scores for AmBi-treated rabbits were lower than those for FLC-treated and control rabbits (P < 0.016 and 0.0005, respectively); the scores for AMB-treated animals were lower than those for the controls (P < 0.0005) but were similar to those for FLC-treated rabbits. All regimens reduced the numbers of CFU in the brain and spinal cord compared with those for the controls (P ≤0.0005). AmBi-treated animals had 3- to 11-fold lower numbers of CFU than FLC-treated rabbits and 6- to 35-fold lower numbers of CFU than AmB-treated rabbits. Three of eight animals given 15 mg of AmBi per kg had no detectable infection in either tissue, whereas other doses of AmBi or FLC cleared either the brain or the spinal cord of infection in fewer rabbits. In addition, clearance of the infection from both tissues was achieved in none of the rabbits, and neither tissue was cleared of infection in AMB-treated animals. Overall, these data indicate that intravenously administered AmBi is superior to oral FLC or intravenous AMB and that FLC is better than AMB against experimental coccidioidal meningitis. These data indicate that AmBi may offer an improvement in the treatment of coccidioidal meningitis. Additional studies are warranted.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 948-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin Ressaire ◽  
Christophe Padoin ◽  
Marc Chaouat ◽  
Veronique Maurel ◽  
Alexandre Alanio ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 175 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Flavio Oliveira Ribeiro ◽  
Vitorino Modesto dos Santos ◽  
Guilherme Teixeira Guimarães Paixão ◽  
Leonardo Rodrigues Cruz ◽  
Milena Zamian Danilow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document