Fungal Invasive Co-Infection Due to Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus arrhizus: A Rhino-Orbital Presentation

Aspergillosis and mucormycosis are filamentous fungal infections occurring predominantly in immunocompromised patients. Fulminant process with rapid infiltration of the contiguous tissue is distinctive for both type of fungi. The rhinocerebral co-infection by Aspergillus and Mucorales is very rare and is usually associated in immunocompromised patients with a high mortality rate. This rare co-infection leads to difficulties in diagnosis, and therapeutic delays can result in a poor prognosis. Overall, the treatment of choice is surgical debridement and liposomal amphotericin B. This paper describes a combined aspergillosis and mucormycosis case in a diabetes mellitus type 2 patient with chronic ulcerations of the palatal and cheek. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an uncommon co-infection of Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizopus arrhizus in a rhino-orbital presentation.

Liposomal Amphotericin B Induced Acute Reactions

Three formulations of amphotericin B are available: liposomal, lipid complex and conventional. The liposomal amphotericin B is more preferred agent than other formulations because of its tolerability, safety and potent antifungal activity. However, the liposomal amphotericin B can cause infusion-related reactions. In this case report, we aimed to report a patient who developed infusion-related reactions during the treatment with the liposomal amphotericin B but eventually tolerated the prolonged infusion. In this case report, we present a patient who developed an infusion-related reaction during The liposomal amphotericin B treatment. A 26-year-old male patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia was hospitalized for the third course of chemotherapy. Due to the invasive fungal infection history in previous hospitalizations, the liposomal amphotericin B 400 mg (IV, 5 mg/kg) once daily was initiated as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Swelling in infusion site and chest pain were reported within 10 minutes of the liposomal amphotericin B administration, and the infusion rate was slowed down to 400 mg/6 hours from 400 mg/2 hours. All these reactions disappeared with prolonged infusion time. The patient received a total of 7 liposomal amphotericin B doses subsequently without any reaction during the chemotherapy cycle. In our experience, the liposomal amphotericin B-induced infusion-related reactions can be resolved by prolonging the infusion time.

Antifungal Effect of Triclosan On Aspergillus Fumigatus: Quorum Quenching Role As A Single Agent And Synergy With Liposomal Amphotericin-B

The purpose of this research was to determine Aspergillus fumigatus conidial viability and its biofilm formation upon treatment with triclosan and amphotericin-B loaded liposomes. A. fumigatus was treated with the antimicrobials, triclosan and liposomal amphotericin-B (L-AMB), in single and combined supplementation. To quantify the cells’ viability upon treatments, resazurin-based viability assay was performed. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was done by applying FUN-1 stain to screen the role of the agents on extracellular polymeric substances. Total A. fumigatus biomass upon treatments was estimated by using crystal violet-based assay. To study the agents’ effect on the conidial viability, flow cytometry analysis was performed. Expression levels of A. fumigatus genes encoding cell wall proteins, α-(1,3)-glucans and galactosaminogalactan were analysed by real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. A synergistic interaction occurred between triclosan and L-AMB when they were added sequentially (triclosan+L-AMB) at their sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations, the triclosan and L-AMB MICs were dropped to 0.6 and 0.2 mg/L, respectively, from 2 and 1 mg/L. Besides, L-AMB and triclosan contributed to the down-regulation of α-(1,3)-glucan and galactosaminogalactan in A. fumigatus conidia and resulted in less conidia aggregation and mycelia adhesion to the biotic/abiotic surfaces; A. fumigatus conidia -became hydrophilic upon treatment, as a result of rodlet layer being masked by a hydrophilic layer or modified by the ionic strength of the rodlet layer. In A. fumigatus, the potential mechanisms of action for L-AMB might be through killing the cells and for triclosan through interrupting the cells’ development as a consequence of quorum quenching.

Case Report: Use of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Low Doses in Patients With Visceral Leishmaniasis

Background: No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal therapy for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), which affects ~12 million people worldwide.Case Presentation: This report described four cases of VL encountered in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between October 2019 and December 2020. Of the four patients, one patient experienced relapse after antimonial treatment, and the remaining patients had primary VL (including one patient with impaired kidney function and one patient with hemophagocytic syndrome). All patients received a novel treatment protocol, namely the low-dose L-AmB therapy, which was characterized by a low initial dose, cautious dose escalation, and low-dose therapy as maintenance. All patients were cured without severe complications, and there was no further recurrence during follow-up.Conclusions: This case series demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the low-dose L-AmB therapy for VL patients, providing novel treatment protocol for the VL.

Nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B as maintenance therapy in ABPA: a randomised, multicentre, trial

BackgroundIn allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), prolonged nebulised antifungal treatment may be a strategy for maintaining remission.MethodsWe performed a randomised, single-blind, clinical trial in 30 centres. Patients with controlled ABPA after a 4-month attack treatment (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were randomly assigned to nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was occurrence of a first severe clinical exacerbation within 24 months following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included the median time-to-first severe clinical exacerbation, number of severe clinical exacerbations per patient, ABPA-related biological parameters.ResultsAmong 174 enrolled patients with ABPA from March 2015 through July 2017, 139 were controlled after 4-month attack treatment and were randomised. The primary outcome occurred in 33 (50.8%) of 65 patients in nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B group and 38 (51.3%) of 74 in placebo group (absolute difference −0.6%, 95% CI −16.8% to +15.6%, odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.90; p=0.95). The median time-to-first severe clinical exacerbation was longer in liposomal-amphotericin-B group, 337 days (IQR, 168 to 476) versus 177 (64 to 288). At the end of maintenance therapy, total immunoglobulin-E and Aspergillus precipitins were significantly decreased in nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B group.ConclusionsIn ABPA, maintenance therapy using nebulised liposomal-amphotericin-B did not reduce the risk of severe clinical exacerbation. The presence of some positive secondary outcomes creates clinical equipoise for further research.

Asymptomatic COVID-19 as a Risk Factor of Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Mucormycosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mucormycosis is a lethal and life-threatening fungal infection. Several cases describing the association of COVID-19 and mucormycosis have been reported. In this article, we report a 58-year-old female with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2 who presented by diabetic ketoacidosis, rhino-orbital mucormycosis, and COVID-19. The patient was treated with liposomal amphotericin B and debridement of necrotic tissue of the rhino-orbital area and paranasal sinuses. Unfortunately, she passed away a few days after orbital surgery. We also conducted a review of the literature and reported 3 other similar cases that suffered from mucormycosis in association with COVID-19 and diabetic ketoacidosis and discussed the importance of this association.

IgG3 and IL10 are effective biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic effectiveness in Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis

Background The assessment of chemotherapeutic responses in Post Kala-azar Dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL), especially its macular form is challenging, emphasizing the necessity for ‘test of cure’ tools. This study explored the diagnostic and prognostic potential of IgG subclasses and associated cytokines for monitoring the effectiveness of chemotherapy in PKDL. Methods Participants included PKDL cases at (a) disease presentation, (b) immediately at the end of treatment (12 weeks for Miltefosine or 3 weeks for Liposomal Amphotericin B, LAmB and (c) at any time point 6 months later, for estimating anti-leishmanial immunoglobulin (Ig, IgG, IgM, IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3) and cytokines (IL-10, IL-6). Results In PKDL, Ig levels were elevated, with IgG3 and IL-10 being the major contributors. Miltefosine decreased both markers substantially and this decrease was sustained for at least six months. In contrast, LAmB failed to decrease IgG3 and IL-10, as even after six months, their levels remained unchanged or even increased. Conclusions In PKDL, IgG3 and IL-10 proved to be effective predictors of responsiveness to chemotherapy and may be considered as a non invasive alternative for longitudinal monitoring.

A case series of mucormycosis and aspergillus coinfection in post-covid-19 patient with uncontrolled diabetic

Mucormycosis is an angioinvasive infection caused by fungi Mucorales which mainly occurs in immunocompromised patients. Aspergillosis is also an opportunistic fungal infection caused by Aspergillus species. Coinfection with mucormycosis and aspergillosis is very rare and very few cases were published in the literature till now. There is an increase in the incidence of mucormycosis infection in post-COVID-19 patients. Here, we are going to report a case series of three cases of combined infection of mucormycosis with Aspergillus. All three patients were treated with extensive surgical debridement and intravenous liposomal amphotericin B. Even after aggressive treatment, the mortality rate is high in these types of patients.

718. Posaconazole Versus Standard of Care for Treatment of Invasive Mold Infections

Background Invasive mold infections (IMIs) including Aspergillus spp. are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Voriconazole is recommended as first line treatment for primary IA. Liposomal amphotericin B and isavuconazole are also recommended alternative therapies. Posaconazole has activity against mold species including those not covered by voriconazole, is available as an IV and oral formulation with a distinct adverse effect profile making it a potential effective alternative for treatment. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of treatment of invasive mold infections (IMIs) with posaconazole compared to standard of care (voriconazole, isavuconazole, liposomal amphotericin B). Methods A retrospective, single center, cohort study was completed to evaluate patients with IMIs treated with posaconazole versus those treated with standard of care therapy. Medication orders for posaconazole or standard of care therapy between January 2012 and December 2020 were identified from a clinical data repository. Only patients with antifungal orders with a listed indication for “treatment of fungal infection” were included. Data collected for each group included baseline demographics, underlying conditions, site of infection, type of mold, therapeutic drug monitoring and classification of IMI. Results A total of 120 patients met inclusion criteria, with 35 patients in the posaconazole group and 85 patients in the SOC group. Baseline characteristics were similar except for increased severe neutropenia in the posaconazole group (p< 0.0001), more probable IMIs in the SOC group (p=0.009) and more possible IMIs in the posaconazole group (p=0.043). In the posaconazole group 37.1% (13/35) of patients were treatment experienced vs. 29.4% (25/85) of patients in the SOC group. More patients achieved a complete/partial response in the SOC group compared to the posaconazole group (p=0.0001) and more patients experienced treatment failure in the posaconazole group (p=0.01). A higher proportion of patients experienced adverse effects in the SOC group compared to the posaconazole group (p=0.0001). Conclusion Posaconazole was not as effective as SOC in treating invasive mold infections but patients experienced comparatively fewer adverse events. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures